What Do We Owe to Novel Synthetic Beings and How Can We Be Sure?

被引:2
|
作者
McKeown, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Warneford Hosp, Wellcome Ctr Eth & Humanities, Dept Psychiat, Oxford OX3 7JX, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
AI; embodiment; consciousness; coupling; agency; moral status; MORAL STATUS; SPECIESISM; INTENTIONALITY; MATTER;
D O I
10.1017/S0963180120001036
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Embodiment is typically given insufficient weight in debates concerning the moral status of Novel Synthetic Beings (NSBs) such as sentient or sapient Artificial Intelligences (AIs). Discussion usually turns on whether AIs are conscious or self-aware, but this does not exhaust what is morally relevant. Since moral agency encompasses what a being wants to do, the means by which it enacts choices in the world is a feature of such agency. In determining the moral status of NSBs and our obligations to them, therefore, we must consider how their corporeality shapes their options, preferences, values, and is constitutive of their moral universe. Analysing AI embodiment and the coupling between cognition and world, the paper shows why determination of moral status is only sensible in terms of the whole being, rather than mental sophistication alone, and why failure to do this leads to an impoverished account of our obligations to such NSBs.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 491
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Technology Mediated Citizenship: What Can We Learn from Library Practices
    Gustafsson, Mariana S.
    Wihlborg, Elin
    Sefyrin, Johanna
    ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION, EPART 2020, 2020, 12220 : 109 - 120
  • [42] Embodied perception of reachable space: how do we manage threatening objects?
    Coello, Yann
    Bourgeois, Jeremy
    Iachini, Tina
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2012, 13 : S131 - S135
  • [43] YOU, ME AND "ALICE": HOW DO WE GET ALONG WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Shomova, Svetlana A.
    VESTNIK MOSKOVSKOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIYA 10. ZHURNALISTIKA, 2024, (03): : 186 - 207
  • [44] Embodied perception of reachable space: how do we manage threatening objects?
    Yann Coello
    Jeremy Bourgeois
    Tina Iachini
    Cognitive Processing, 2012, 13 : 131 - 135
  • [45] How we walk affects what we remember: Gait modifications through biofeedback change negative affective memory bias
    Michalak, Johannes
    Rohde, Katharina
    Troje, Nikolaus F.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 46 : 121 - 125
  • [46] What we do today is what matters: a social identity perspective on green HRM and environmental performance
    Pahi, Munwar Hussain
    Ahmed, Umair
    Umrani, Waheed Ali
    Al Riyami, Said
    Siddiqui, Muhammad Athar
    Syed, Obed Rashdi
    Ramayah, T.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM INSIGHTS, 2025,
  • [47] Artificial Intelligence in medicine: Where do we stand today and what lies ahead?
    Garcia-Agundez, Augusto
    Eickhoff, Carsten
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2025, 39 (01): : 44 - 51
  • [48] Rogue AI: Cautionary Cases in Neuroradiology and What We Can Learn From Them
    Young, Austin
    Tan, Kevin
    Tariq, Faiq
    Fin, Michael X.
    Bluestone, Avraham Y.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [49] Motivating students for physical activity: What can we learn from student perspectives?
    Boonekamp, Gwendolijn M. M.
    Dierx, John A. J.
    Jansen, Erik
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2021, 27 (03) : 512 - 528
  • [50] Intentionality and What We Can Learn about It from Searle's Theory of Institutions
    Toracova, Pavla
    ORGANON F, 2012, 19 (02) : 83 - 92