Association of Compliance With Process-Related Quality Metrics and Improved Survival in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

被引:46
作者
Graboyes, Evan M. [1 ]
Gross, Jennifer [1 ]
Kallogjeri, Dorina [1 ]
Piccirillo, Jay F. [1 ]
Al-Gilani, Maha [1 ]
Stadler, Michael E. [2 ]
Nussenbaum, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 660 S Euclid Ave,Campus Box 8115, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Otolaryngol & Commun Sci, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
LARYNGEAL-CANCER CARE; TRAUMA CENTERS; SURGICAL CARE; OUTCOMES; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; RESECTION; MEDICARE; YIELD; HEAD;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3595
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Quality metrics for patients with head and neck cancer are available, but it is unknown whether compliance with these metrics is associated with improved patient survival. OBJECTIVE To identify whether compliance with various process-related quality metrics is associated with improved survival in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma who receive definitive surgery with or without adjuvant therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center among 192 patients with previously untreated oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma who underwent definitive surgery with or without adjuvant therapy between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2010. Data analysis was performed from January 26 to August 7, 2015. INTERVENTIONS Surgery with or without adjuvant therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Compliance with a collection of process-related quality metrics possessing face validity that covered pretreatment evaluation, treatment, and posttreatment surveillance was evaluated. Association between compliance with these quality metrics and overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival was calculated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS Among 192 patients, compliance with the individual quality metrics ranged from 19.7% to 93.6%(median, 82.8%). No pretreatment or surveillance metrics were associated with improved survival. Compliance with the following treatment-related quality metrics was associated with improved survival: elective neck dissection with lymph node yield of 18 or more, no unplanned surgery within 14 days of the index surgery, no unplanned 30-day readmissions, and referral for adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologic stage III or IV disease. Increased compliance with a "clinical care signature" composed of these 4 metrics was associated with improved overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival on univariable analysis (log-rank test; P < .05 for each). On multivariable analysis controlling for pT stage, pN stage, extracapsular spread, margin status, and comorbidity, increased compliance with these 4 metrics was associated with improved overall survival (100% vs <= 50% compliance: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.2; 95% CI, 2.1-8.5; 100% vs 51%-99% compliance: aHR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-3.1), improved disease-specific survival (100% vs <= 50% compliance: aHR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7-9.0; 100% vs 51%-99%: aHR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.6-2.9), and improved disease-free survival (100% vs <= 50% compliance: aHR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-5.8; 100% vs 51%-99% compliance: aHR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.9-2.7). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Compliance with a core set of process-related quality metrics was associated with improved survival for patients with surgically managed oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Multi-institutional validation of these metrics is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 437
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, YOUR GUID CHOOS QUAL
[2]   Variations in Gastric Cancer Care [J].
Al-Refaie, Waddah B. ;
Gay, Greer ;
Virnig, Beth A. ;
Tseng, Jennifer F. ;
Stewart, Andrew ;
Vickers, Selwyn M. ;
Tuttle, Todd. M. ;
Feig, Barry W. .
CANCER, 2010, 116 (02) :465-475
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, V134, P672, DOI 10.1001/archotol.134.6.672
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SURG CAR IMPR PROJ
[5]  
[Anonymous], COC QUAL CAR MEAS
[6]   Measuring the quality of surgical care: Structure, process, or outcomes? [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Dimick, JB ;
Birkmeyer, NJO .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 198 (04) :626-632
[7]   Getting More Performance from Performance Measurement [J].
Cassel, Christine K. ;
Conway, Patrick H. ;
Delbanco, Suzanne F. ;
Jha, Ashish K. ;
Saunders, Robert S. ;
Lee, Thomas H. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (23) :2145-2147
[8]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2004, CMS HQI DEM PROJ COM
[9]   Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: Systematic review [J].
Chang, George J. ;
Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A. ;
Skibber, John M. ;
Moyer, Virginia A. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (06) :433-441
[10]  
Committee on Quality Health Care in America Institute of Medicine, 2001, CROSSING QUALITY CHA