Cumulative Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk Estimation in Common Diagnostic Radiology Procedures

被引:10
作者
Nikzad, Safoora [1 ]
Pourkaveh, Maryam [2 ]
Vesal, Naghi Jabbari [1 ]
Gharekhanloo, Farideh [3 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Med Phys, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Fac Paramed, Dept Radiol, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
Diagnostic Radiology; Cumulative Dose; Entrance Surface Dose; Effective Dose; Cancer Risk Estimation; X-RAY EXAMINATIONS; RADIOGRAPHY; IRAN;
D O I
10.5812/iranjradiol.60955
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnostic radiology by the use of ionizing radiation plays a main contribution in the collective dose of human population. Knowing the radiation dose received by patients during a radiological examination is essential to prevent the excess health risk of exposure. Objectives: The aim of this study was to estimate the collective dose and calculate the cancer risk probability due to common radiological procedures in four radiology imaging centers of Iran. Patients and Methods: Four hundred seventy patients who underwent different radiological examinations including the skull, chest, abdomen, pelvis, lumbar, cervical and thoracic regions in four radiology centers of Hamadan, Iran were studied. The patients' entrance surface dose (ESD) was measured, and eventually, the effective dose (ED) was calculated. These parameters were compared with the reported values and international standard levels. Finally, the risk of cancer was determined by two different methods proposed in international commission on radiological protection (ICRP) 103. Results: Mean values of ESD for chest, abdomen, pelvis, lumbar region, skull, cervical and thoracic regions were 0.43 +/- 0.09,2.51 +/- 0.19,2.47 +/- 0.02,3.21 +/- 0.17,2.15 +/- 0.11,1.35 +/- 0.15, and 2.51 +/- 0.19 mGy, respectively. The mean values of ED were 0.05, 0.33, 0.25, 0.42, 0.02, 0.05 and 0.24 mSv, respectively for these organs. The cancer risk probability as a function of cumulative dose was 0.20, 1.21,0.08,1.32,0.01,0.01 and 0.04 (person-Sv x 5% per Sievert) for the interested organs, respectively. The risk of cancer as a function of age and sex for male patients was 0.86, 1.47, 0.59, 0.02, 0.16,1.96 and 0.76 (in 103 person) for the bladder, colon, liver, thyroid, esophagus, lung and stomach, respectively. These values were, 0.34 (or 2.12), 0.73 (or 4.47), 0.98,0.43,0.72, 0.19,0.25, 0.26 and 1.20 (in 103 persons) for breast, lung, bladder, ovary, colon, liver, thyroid, esophagus and stomach for females. Conclusion: Results show that the estimated health risk based on ICRP health risk of 500 cases per 10000 person - Sv (5% per Sievert) was in total about 2 cases for seven examinations in 2016. Risks of cancer as a function of age and sex for male patients were higher for lung and colon cancers and for females, it was higher for breast and lung cancers.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Aliasgharzadeh Akbar, 2015, Glob J Health Sci, V7, P202, DOI 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p202
[2]   Doses to patients in some routine diagnostic X-ray examinations in Iran: proposed the first Iranian diagnostic reference levels [J].
Asadinezhad, Mohsen ;
Bahreyni Toossi, Mohammad Taghi .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 132 (04) :409-414
[3]   Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays:: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries [J].
Berrington de González, A ;
Darby, S .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9406) :345-351
[4]   First results on patient dose measurements from conventional diagnostic radiology procedures in Serbia and Montenegro [J].
Ciraj, O ;
Markovic, S ;
Kosutic, D .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 113 (03) :330-335
[5]  
Ciraj O., 2003, Nuclear Technology Radiation Protection, V1, P36
[6]   Local diagnostic reference levels in standard X-ray examinations [J].
Compagnone, G ;
Pagan, L ;
Bergamini, C .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 113 (01) :54-63
[7]   Patient dose in digital projection radiography [J].
Compagnone, Gaetano ;
Pagan, Laura ;
Baleni, Massimo Casadio ;
Calzolaio, Felice Luca ;
Barozzi, Libero ;
Bergamini, Carlo .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 129 (1-3) :135-137
[8]   An economic evaluation of the use of rare earth screens to reduce the radiation dose from diagnostic X-ray procedures in Israel [J].
Ginsberg, GM ;
Schlesinger, T ;
Ben-Shlomo, A ;
Kushilevsky, A ;
Margaliot, M ;
Oren, M ;
Finkleman, M ;
Friedman, A ;
Handlesman, M ;
Lev, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (844) :406-412
[9]   A Nordic survey of patient doses in diagnostic radiology [J].
Gron, P ;
Olerud, HM ;
Einarsson, G ;
Leitz, W ;
Servomaa, A ;
Schoultz, BW ;
Hjardenmaal, O .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (12) :1988-1992
[10]   Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology [J].
Hall, E. J. ;
Brenner, D. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 81 (965) :362-378