Choosing between linear and nonlinear models and avoiding overfitting for short and long term groundwater level forecasting in a linear system

被引:37
作者
Zanotti, Chiara [1 ]
Rotiroti, Marco [1 ]
Sterlacchini, Simone [2 ]
Cappellini, Giacomo [2 ]
Fumagalli, Letizia [1 ]
Stefania, Gennaro A. [1 ]
Nannucci, Marco S. [3 ]
Leoni, Barbara [1 ]
Bonomi, Tullia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Piazza Sci 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[2] CNR, Inst Dynam Environm Proc, Piazza Sci 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[3] Settore Serv Pubbl Locali, Direz Ambiente & Energia, Via San Gallo 34-A, I-50129 Florence, Region Toscana, Italy
关键词
Bayesian regularization; Groundwater level forecasting; Linear model; Neural networks; Overfitting; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; INDOOR TEMPERATURE; AQUIFER SYSTEM; TIME-SERIES; PREDICTION; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; REGRESSION; VARIABLES; RECHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124015
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Groundwater level forecasting is a useful tool for a more efficient and sustainable groundwater resource management. Developing models that can accurately reproduce groundwater level response to meteorological conditions can lead to a better understanding of the groundwater resource availability. Here an autoregressive neural network (NNARx) approach is proposed and compared with autoregressive linear models with exogenous input (ARx) in order to forecast groundwater level in an aquifer system where a linear groundwater level response to recharge by rainfall is observed. A well known problem regarding neural networks consists in the high risk of overfitting. Here, three NNARx model were trained using different methods to avoid overfitting: Early stopping, Bayesian regularization and a combination of both. The results show that on the short term forecasting (up to 15 days) the performance of NNARx and ARx are comparable but the ARx model generalizes better, while the NNARx trained with Bayesian regularization outperforms the linear models and the other NNARx models on longer scenarios on the test set. As linear models are less time demanding and do not require high computational power, they can be considered as suitable tools for short term groundwater level forecasting in linear systems while when longer scenarios are needed neural networks can be considered more reliable, and training them with Bayesian regularization allows to minimize the risk of overfitting.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting
    Adamowski, Jan
    Chan, Hiu Fung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 407 (1-4) : 28 - 40
  • [3] Groundwater head sampling based on stochastic analysis
    Ahn, H
    Salas, JD
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1997, 33 (12) : 2769 - 2780
  • [4] Altmann, 1986, PSYCHOLINGUISTICS
  • [5] Forecasting of groundwater level in hard rock region using artificial neural network
    Banerjee, Pallavi
    Prasad, R. K.
    Singh, V. S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2009, 58 (06): : 1239 - 1246
  • [6] Beale M.H., 2016, Neural Network Toolbox User's Guide
  • [7] Characterising performance of environmental models
    Bennett, Neil D.
    Croke, Barry F. W.
    Guariso, Giorgio
    Guillaume, Joseph H. A.
    Hamilton, Serena H.
    Jakeman, Anthony J.
    Marsili-Libelli, Stefano
    Newham, Lachlan T. H.
    Norton, John P.
    Perrin, Charles
    Pierce, Suzanne A.
    Robson, Barbara
    Seppelt, Ralf
    Voinov, Alexey A.
    Fath, Brian D.
    Andreassian, Vazken
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 40 : 1 - 20
  • [8] Gradient-based model calibration with proxy-model assistance
    Burrows, Wesley
    Doherty, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 533 : 114 - 127
  • [9] Efficient Calibration/Uncertainty Analysis Using Paired Complex/Surrogate Models
    Burrows, Wesley
    Doherty, John
    [J]. GROUNDWATER, 2015, 53 (04) : 531 - 541
  • [10] Reconstruction of the indoor temperature dataset of a house using data driven models for performance evaluation
    Candanedo, Luis M.
    Feldheim, Veronique
    Deramaix, Dominique
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 138 : 250 - 261