Facing the uncertainty of CO2 storage capacity in China by developing different storage scenarios

被引:11
作者
Hoeller, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Viebahn, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuppertal Inst Climate Environm & Energy, Doppersberg 19, D-42103 Wuppertal, Germany
[2] Umweltbundesamt, German Fed Environm Agcy, Bismarckpl 1, D-14193 Berlin, Germany
关键词
CCS; CO2 storage capacity; China; Scenarios; Uncertainty; DEEP SALINE AQUIFERS; CARBON-DIOXIDE; GEOLOGICAL STORAGE; SONGLIAO BASIN; BOHAI BASIN; CAPTURE; SEQUESTRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.043
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China is very active in the research and development of CO2 capture and storage technologies (CCS). However, existing estimates for CO2 storage capacity are very uncertain. This uncertainty is due to limited geological knowledge, a lack of large-scale research on CO2 injection, and different assessment approaches and parameter settings. Hence storage scenarios represent a method that can be used by policy makers to demonstrate the range of possible storage capacity developments, to help interpret uncertain results and to identify the limitations of existing assessments. In this paper, three storage scenarios are developed for China by evaluating China-wide studies supplemented with more detailed site- and basin specific assessments. It is estimated that the greatest storage potential can be found in deep saline aquifers. Oil and gas fields may also be used. Coal seams are only included in the highest storage scenario. In total, the scenarios presented demonstrate that China has an effective storage capacity of between 65 and 1551 Gt of CO2. Furthermore, the authors emphasise a need for action to harmonise storage capacity assessment approaches due to the uncertainties involved in the capacity assessments analysed in this study. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 73
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], QUAL GUID EN SYST ST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[3]   CO2 storage capacity estimation:: Methodology and gaps [J].
Bachu, Stefan ;
Bonijoly, Didier ;
Bradshaw, John ;
Burruss, Robert ;
Holloway, Sam ;
Christensen, Niels Peter ;
Mathiassen, Odd Magne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (04) :430-443
[4]   Review of CO2 storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers [J].
Bachu, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 40 :188-202
[5]   CO2 storage capacity estimation:: Issues and development of standards [J].
Bradshaw, John ;
Bachu, Stefan ;
Bonijoly, Didier ;
Burruss, Robert ;
Holloway, Sam ;
Christensen, Niels Peter ;
Mathiassen, Odd Magne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (01) :62-68
[6]   CCS scenarios optimisation by spatial multi-criteria analysis: application to multiple source-sink matching in the Bohai Basin (North China) [J].
Chen, Wenying ;
Teng, Fei ;
Xu, Ruina ;
Xiang, Xing ;
Zeng, Rongshu ;
Domptail, Kim ;
Allier, Delphine ;
Le Nindre, Yves-Michel .
GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01) :4167-4174
[7]   Clean coal technology development in China [J].
Chen, Wenying ;
Xu, Ruina .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (05) :2123-2130
[8]  
CO2CRC APEC, 2005, CO2 STOR PROSP SEL S
[9]  
Dahowski RT, 2009, 19091 PNNL US DOE
[10]  
Dooley J. J., 2005, Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, P573