GDPR Compliant Blockchains-A Systematic Literature Review

被引:53
作者
Haque, A. K. M. Bahalul [1 ]
Islam, A. K. M. Najmul [1 ]
Hyrynsalmi, Sami [1 ]
Naqvi, Bilal [1 ]
Smolander, Kari [1 ]
机构
[1] LUT Univ, LENS, Software Engn, Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
关键词
Blockchain; General Data Protection Regulation; Regulation; Systematics; Bibliographies; Europe; Program processors; general data protection regulation (GDPR); systematic literature review; DATA PROTECTION REGULATION; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES; EDGE;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069877
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Although blockchain-based digital services promise trust, accountability, and transparency, multiple paradoxes between blockchains and GDPR have been highlighted in the recent literature. Some of the recent literature also proposed possible solutions to these paradoxes. This article aims to conduct a systematic literature review on GDPR compliant blockchains and synthesize the findings. In particular, the goal was to identify 1) the GDPR articles that have been explored in prior literature; 2) the relevant research domains that have been explored, and 3) the research gaps. Our findings synthesized that the blockchains relevant GDPR articles can be categorized into six major groups, namely data deletion and modification (Article 16, 17, and 18), protection by design by default (Article 25), responsibilities of controllers and processors (Article 24, 26, and 28), consent management (Article 7), data processing principles and lawfulness (Article 5,6 and 12), and territorial scope (Article 3). We also found seven research domains where GDPR compliant blockchains have been discussed, which include IoT, financial data, healthcare, personal identity, online data, information governance, and smart city. From our analysis, we have identified a few key research gaps and present a future research direction.
引用
收藏
页码:50593 / 50606
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[11]   Immutability and Decentralized Storage: An Analysis of Emerging Threats [J].
Casino, Fran ;
Politou, Eugenia ;
Alepis, Efthimios ;
Patsakis, Constantinos .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :4737-4744
[12]   A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues [J].
Casino, Fran ;
Dasaklis, Thomas K. ;
Patsakis, Constantinos .
TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2019, 36 :55-81
[13]  
Damian, 2019, P INT C EL EN SYST S, P1, DOI [10.1109/SIELMEN.2019.8905896, DOI 10.1109/SIELMEN.2019.8905896]
[14]   The proposed data protection Regulation replacing Directive 95/46/EC: A sound system for the protection of individuals [J].
De Hert, Paul ;
Papakonstantinou, Vagelis .
COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2012, 28 (02) :130-142
[15]   Blockchain and business ethics [J].
Dierksmeier, Claus ;
Seele, Peter .
BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2020, 29 (02) :348-359
[16]  
Dorri Ali, 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), P618, DOI 10.1109/PERCOMW.2017.7917634
[17]  
Du MX, 2017, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P2567, DOI 10.1109/SMC.2017.8123011
[18]   Blockchain vs GDPR in Collaborative Data Governance [J].
Dutta, Rahul ;
Das, Arijit ;
Dey, Ayan ;
Bhattacharya, Sukriti .
COOPERATIVE DESIGN, VISUALIZATION, AND ENGINEERING, CDVE 2020, 2020, 12341 :81-92
[19]   An Analysis of Blockchain and GDPR under the Data Lifecycle Perspective [J].
Freund, Gislaine Parra ;
Fagundes, Priscila Basto ;
Jeronimo de Macedo, Douglas Dyllon .
MOBILE NETWORKS & APPLICATIONS, 2021, 26 (01) :266-276
[20]  
Giannopoulou Alexandra, 2020, Blockchain and Applications. 2nd International Congress. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC 1238), P91, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-52535-4_10