GDPR Compliant Blockchains-A Systematic Literature Review

被引:53
作者
Haque, A. K. M. Bahalul [1 ]
Islam, A. K. M. Najmul [1 ]
Hyrynsalmi, Sami [1 ]
Naqvi, Bilal [1 ]
Smolander, Kari [1 ]
机构
[1] LUT Univ, LENS, Software Engn, Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
关键词
Blockchain; General Data Protection Regulation; Regulation; Systematics; Bibliographies; Europe; Program processors; general data protection regulation (GDPR); systematic literature review; DATA PROTECTION REGULATION; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES; EDGE;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069877
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Although blockchain-based digital services promise trust, accountability, and transparency, multiple paradoxes between blockchains and GDPR have been highlighted in the recent literature. Some of the recent literature also proposed possible solutions to these paradoxes. This article aims to conduct a systematic literature review on GDPR compliant blockchains and synthesize the findings. In particular, the goal was to identify 1) the GDPR articles that have been explored in prior literature; 2) the relevant research domains that have been explored, and 3) the research gaps. Our findings synthesized that the blockchains relevant GDPR articles can be categorized into six major groups, namely data deletion and modification (Article 16, 17, and 18), protection by design by default (Article 25), responsibilities of controllers and processors (Article 24, 26, and 28), consent management (Article 7), data processing principles and lawfulness (Article 5,6 and 12), and territorial scope (Article 3). We also found seven research domains where GDPR compliant blockchains have been discussed, which include IoT, financial data, healthcare, personal identity, online data, information governance, and smart city. From our analysis, we have identified a few key research gaps and present a future research direction.
引用
收藏
页码:50593 / 50606
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   GDPR Compliant Consent Driven Data Protection in Online Social Networks: A Blockchain-Based Approach [J].
Ahmed, Javed ;
Yildirim, Sule ;
Nowostaki, Mariusz ;
Ramachandra, Raghvendra ;
Elezaj, Ogerta ;
Abomohara, Mohamad .
2020 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES (ICICT 2020), 2020, :307-312
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, GUIDELINES PERFORMIN, DOI DOI 10.1145/12345678
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 2017 International Conference on Internet of Things for the Global Community (IoTGC), DOI DOI 10.1109/IOTGC.2017.8008970
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, BLOCKCHAIN GEN DATA
[5]   Visual Surveillance Within the EU General Data Protection Regulation A Technology Perspective [J].
Asghar, Mamoona N. ;
Kanwal, Nadia ;
Lee, Brian ;
Fleury, Martin ;
Herbst, Marco ;
Qiao, Yuansong .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :111709-111726
[6]  
Barati M, 2019, INT CONF UTIL CLOUD, P133, DOI 10.1145/3344341.3368812
[7]   When Blockchain Meets the Right to be Forgotten: Technology Versus Law in the Healthcare Industry [J].
Bayle, Aurelie ;
Koscina, Mirko ;
Manset, David ;
Perez-Kempner, Octavio .
2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE (WI 2018), 2018, :788-792
[8]   Digital Forensics and Privacy-by-Design: Example in a Blockchain-Based Dynamic Navigation System [J].
Billard, David ;
Bartolomei, Baptiste .
PRIVACY TECHNOLOGIES AND POLICY, APF 2019, 2019, 11498 :151-160
[9]   Bitcoin and the GDPR: Allocating responsibility in distributed networks [J].
Buocz, Thomas ;
Ehrke-Rabel, Tina ;
Hoedl, Elisabeth ;
Eisenberger, Iris .
COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2019, 35 (02) :182-198
[10]   Designing a GDPR compliant blockchain-based IoV distributed information tracking system [J].
Campanile, Lelio ;
Iacono, Mauro ;
Marulli, Fiammetta ;
Mastroianni, Michele .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 58 (03)