Calculating eGFR Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values Obtained Through MR Imaging

被引:2
|
作者
Kanpittaya, Jaturat [1 ]
Jaimook, Patrawan [1 ]
Thongkrau, Theerayut [2 ]
Keeratikasikorn, Chaiyapon [2 ]
Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[2] Khon Kaen Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Fac Sci, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[3] Khon Kaen Univ, Dept Med & Ambulatory, Med Res Grp, Fac Med, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[4] Khon Kaen Univ, Res Ctr Back Neck Other Joint Pain & Human Perfor, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[5] Khon Kaen Univ, Sleep Apnea Res Grp, Res & Training Ctr Enhancing Qual Life Working Ag, Khon Kaen, Thailand
关键词
Diffusion Weight Image; Apparent Diffusion Coefficient; Renal Function; Formula; Online; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; RENAL-FUNCTION; CREATININE CLEARANCE; MEN;
D O I
10.5812/iranjradiol.13682
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Renal dysfunction is associated with significantly lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. There are several ADC-level cutoff points that indicate renal dysfunction. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether or not ADC values can predict estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. If so, the formula to calculate eGFR level by ADC levels will be formulated. Patients and Methods: We reviewed all adult patients who underwent upper abdomen MRI and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) protocol from January 2014 to October 2014. The ADC values and eGFR levels were recorded. The multivariate linear regression was implemented between the eGFR and studied variables. The formula to predict eGFR was produced by the final model of multivariate linear regression analysis. An online formula for eGFR prediction was also created. Results: There were 261 patients who met the study criteria of which 133 patients were male (51.10). The mean age and body weight (S.D.) of all patients was 59.89 years (13.73) and 55.92 kg (11.17), respectively. The majority of patients had an eGFR of 60 - 89 mL/min (107 patients; 41.00%). The average ADC value of all patients was 1.87 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. There were four factors that were significantly associated with eGFR by multivariate linear regression analysis: age, sex, body weight, and ADC value. ADC value had the highest estimates at 121.94. Conclusion: ADC values can predict eGFR using the following formula: estimated eGFR = -139.03 - (0.80 X age) - (4.19 x sex; 10 if female and 1 if male]) + 0.57 (body weight in kg) + (121.94 x ADC). This formula was also created as an online tool for both mobile and computer at http://202.28.94.20/gfr/.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does reversal of ischemia on diffusion-weighted imaging reflect higher apparent diffusion coefficient values?
    Lutsep, HL
    Nesbit, GM
    Berger, RM
    Coshow, WR
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2001, 11 (03) : 313 - 316
  • [22] Comparison of Absolute Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in ADC Maps Generated Across Different Postprocessing Software: Reproducibility in Endometrial Carcinoma
    Ghosh, Adarsh
    Singh, Tulika
    Singla, Veenu
    Bagga, Rashmi
    Khandelwal, Niranjan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (06) : 1312 - 1320
  • [23] Do Intratumoral and Peritumoral Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values Have A Role in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Brain Tumors?
    Dogan, Gulec Mert
    Sigirci, Ahmet
    Tasolar, Sevgi
    Cengiz, Aslinur
    Ulubaba, Hilal Er
    Onal, Selami Cagatay
    Karadag, Nese
    IZMIR DR BEHCET UZ COCUK HASTANESI DERGISI, 2020, 10 (03): : 251 - 259
  • [24] Effects of MR Parameter Changes on the Quantification of Diffusion Anisotropy and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Evaluation Using a Diffusional Anisotropic Phantom
    Kim, Sang Joon
    Choi, Choong Gon
    Kim, Jeong Kon
    Yun, Sung-Cheol
    Jahng, Geon-Ho
    Jeong, Ha-Kyu
    Kim, Eun Ju
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 16 (02) : 297 - U238
  • [25] Development of a novel method for visualizing restricted diffusion using subtraction of apparent diffusion coefficient values
    Yoshimura, Yuuki
    Kuroda, Masahiro
    Sugianto, Irfan
    Khasawneh, Abdullah
    Bamgbose, Babatunde O.
    Hamada, Kentaro
    Barham, Majd
    Tekiki, Nouha
    Kurozumi, Akira
    Matsushita, Toshi
    Ohno, Seiichiro
    Kanazawa, Susumu
    Asaumi, Junichi
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS, 2019, 20 (03) : 2963 - 2969
  • [26] Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in Patients with Diffuse Gliomas
    Busic, Marija
    Rumboldt, Zoran
    Cerina, Dora
    Busic, Zeljko
    Dolic, Kresimir
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [27] Robust Estimation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in Heterogeneous Solid Tumors
    Walker-Samuel, Simon
    Orton, Matthew
    McPhail, Lesley D.
    Robinson, Simon P.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 62 (02) : 420 - 429
  • [28] Characterization of Alzheimer's Disease Using Ultra-high b-values Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging
    Xue, Yingnan
    Zhang, Zhenhua
    Wen, Caiyun
    Liu, Huiru
    Wang, Suyuan
    Li, Jiance
    Zhuge, Qichuan
    Chen, Weijian
    Ye, Qiong
    AGING AND DISEASE, 2019, 10 (05): : 1026 - 1036
  • [29] Role of Diffusion Weighted Imaging with Corresponding Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions
    Varshitha G.R.
    Sakalecha A.K.
    Darshan A.V.
    Chaithanya A.
    Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2022, 19 (06) : 383 - 389
  • [30] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and Tumor Proliferation
    Wang, Xi Zhen
    Wang, Bin
    Gao, Zhi Qin
    Liu, Jin Gang
    Liu, Zuo Qin
    Niu, Qing Liang
    Sun, Zhen Kui
    Yuan, Yu Xiao
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 29 (06) : 1360 - 1366