Calculating eGFR Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values Obtained Through MR Imaging

被引:2
|
作者
Kanpittaya, Jaturat [1 ]
Jaimook, Patrawan [1 ]
Thongkrau, Theerayut [2 ]
Keeratikasikorn, Chaiyapon [2 ]
Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[2] Khon Kaen Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Fac Sci, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[3] Khon Kaen Univ, Dept Med & Ambulatory, Med Res Grp, Fac Med, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[4] Khon Kaen Univ, Res Ctr Back Neck Other Joint Pain & Human Perfor, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[5] Khon Kaen Univ, Sleep Apnea Res Grp, Res & Training Ctr Enhancing Qual Life Working Ag, Khon Kaen, Thailand
关键词
Diffusion Weight Image; Apparent Diffusion Coefficient; Renal Function; Formula; Online; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; RENAL-FUNCTION; CREATININE CLEARANCE; MEN;
D O I
10.5812/iranjradiol.13682
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Renal dysfunction is associated with significantly lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. There are several ADC-level cutoff points that indicate renal dysfunction. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether or not ADC values can predict estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. If so, the formula to calculate eGFR level by ADC levels will be formulated. Patients and Methods: We reviewed all adult patients who underwent upper abdomen MRI and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) protocol from January 2014 to October 2014. The ADC values and eGFR levels were recorded. The multivariate linear regression was implemented between the eGFR and studied variables. The formula to predict eGFR was produced by the final model of multivariate linear regression analysis. An online formula for eGFR prediction was also created. Results: There were 261 patients who met the study criteria of which 133 patients were male (51.10). The mean age and body weight (S.D.) of all patients was 59.89 years (13.73) and 55.92 kg (11.17), respectively. The majority of patients had an eGFR of 60 - 89 mL/min (107 patients; 41.00%). The average ADC value of all patients was 1.87 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. There were four factors that were significantly associated with eGFR by multivariate linear regression analysis: age, sex, body weight, and ADC value. ADC value had the highest estimates at 121.94. Conclusion: ADC values can predict eGFR using the following formula: estimated eGFR = -139.03 - (0.80 X age) - (4.19 x sex; 10 if female and 1 if male]) + 0.57 (body weight in kg) + (121.94 x ADC). This formula was also created as an online tool for both mobile and computer at http://202.28.94.20/gfr/.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hepatic abscesses: possibility of different apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-values in early and mature abscess formation
    Konstantin Holzapfel
    Ernst Rummeny
    Jochen Gaa
    Abdominal Imaging, 2007, 32 : 538 - 539
  • [2] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hepatic abscesses: possibility of different apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-values in early and mature abscess formation
    Holzapfel, Konstantin
    Rummeny, Ernst
    Gaa, Jochen
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2007, 32 (04): : 538 - 539
  • [3] Diffusion MRI: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the normal brain and a classification of brain disorders based on ADC values
    Sener, RN
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2001, 25 (04) : 299 - 326
  • [4] Diffusion-weighted Imaging of Ovarian Torsion: Usefulness of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values for the Detection of Hemorrhagic Infarction
    Kato, Hiroki
    Kanematsu, Masayuki
    Uchiyama, Mariko
    Yano, Ryuichiro
    Furui, Tatsuro
    Morishige, Ken-ichirou
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 13 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [5] Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for detection of malignanat vertebral bone marrow lesions
    Filograna, L.
    Magarelli, N.
    Cellini, F.
    Manfrida, S.
    Leone, A.
    Colosimo, C.
    Valentini, V.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (03) : 590 - 597
  • [6] Diffusion–Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Versus Contrast–Enhanced MR Imaging in the Identification and Characterisation of Acute Pyelonephritis
    Riccardo Faletti
    Maria Carla Cassinis
    Paolo Fonio
    Angela Grasso
    Giacomo Battisti
    Laura Bergamasco
    Giovanni Gandini
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 3501 - 3508
  • [7] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Measurement in Endometrial Carcinoma: Effect of Region of Interest Methods on ADC Values
    Inoue, Chie
    Fujii, Shinya
    Kaneda, Sachi
    Fukunaga, Takeru
    Kaminou, Toshio
    Kigawa, Junzo
    Harada, Tasuku
    Ogawa, Toshihide
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 40 (01) : 157 - 161
  • [8] Evaluation of the Imaging Process for a Novel Subtraction Method Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values
    Hamada, Kentaro
    Kuroda, Masahiro
    Yoshimura, Yuuki
    Khasawneh, Abdullah
    Barham, Majd
    Tekiki, Nouha
    Sugianto, Irfan
    Bamgbose, Babatunde O.
    Konishi, Kohei
    Sugimoto, Kohei
    Ishizaka, Hinata
    Kurozumi, Akira
    Matsushita, Toshi
    Ohno, Seiichiro
    Kanazawa, Susumu
    Asaumi, Junichi
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2021, 75 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [9] Application of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Active Sacroiliitis and the Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values
    Toslak, Iclal Erdem
    Bilgilisoy Filiz, Meral
    Cekic, Bulent
    Parlak, Ayse Eda
    Cay, Hasan Fatih
    Yildiz, Sevim
    Erol, Bekir
    Ozel, Deniz
    Sezer, Ilhan
    ARCHIVES OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (03): : 254 - 264
  • [10] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Versus Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in the Identification and Characterisation of Acute Pyelonephritis
    Faletti, Riccardo
    Cassinis, Maria Carla
    Fonio, Paolo
    Grasso, Angela
    Battisti, Giacomo
    Bergamasco, Laura
    Gandini, Giovanni
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (12) : 3501 - 3508