IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME!: THE INFLUENCE OF KNOWLEDGE GOVERNANCE TOOLS ON KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER AND UTILIZATION IN MNEs

被引：37

作者：

Andersson, Ulf ^{[1
,2
]}

Buckley, Peter J. ^{[3
,4
]}

Dellestrand, Henrik ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Malardalen Univ, Sch Business Soc & Engn, Vasteras, Sweden

[2] BI Norwegian Business Sch, Dept Strategy & Logist, Oslo, Norway

[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Ctr Int Business, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England

[4] Univ Int Business & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China

[5] Uppsala Univ, Dept Business Studies, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden

来源：

GLOBAL STRATEGY JOURNAL | 2015年 / 5卷 / 01期

关键词：

headquarter-subsidiary roles and relations; knowledge governance; knowledge management; multinational enterprise; relationships; COMMON METHOD VARIANCE; SOCIAL-STRUCTURE; MULTINATIONAL-CORPORATIONS; MANAGING KNOWLEDGE; HEADQUARTERS; FLOWS; FIRM; CAPABILITIES; ORGANIZATION; PERFORMANCE;

D O I：

10.1002/gsj.1088

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

This article examines the utilization of knowledge transferred between sending and receiving subsidiaries within multinational enterprises. A model was developed and tested on 169 specific knowledge transfer projects. The model explains the utilization of knowledge subject to transfer in terms of hierarchical governance tool efficacy and lateral relationships within the multinational enterprise. The results show that headquarters' involvement during knowledge development does not have any significant impact on subsequent knowledge utilization in the receiving units and, in fact, hierarchical governance forms have a negative impact on knowledge utilization. However, lateral relationships are positive stimuli to building subsidiary capabilities in the knowledge transfer process that enhance receiving unit knowledge utilization. Copyright (C) 2015 Strategic Management Society.

引用

页码：27 / 47

页数：21

共 127 条

[1] Social capital: Prospects for a new concept [J].

Adler, PS ;

Kwon, SW .

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (01) :17-40

[2] How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data [J].

Agrawal, Ajay ;

Kapur, Devesh ;

McHale, John .

JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (02) :258-269

[3] Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building [J].

Almeida, P ;

Song, JY ;

Grant, RM .

ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (02) :147-161

[4] What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? [J].

Ambos, Tina C. ;

Andersson, Ulf ;

Birkinshaw, Julian .

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2010, 41 (07) :1099-1118

[5] Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view [J].

Andersson, Ulf ;

Forsgren, Mats ;

Holm, Ulf .

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2007, 38 (05) :802-818

[6]

[Anonymous], PROGR INT BUSINESS R

[7]

[Anonymous], 2005, The Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, V3rd

[8] Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms [J].

Argote, L ;

Ingram, P .

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 82 (01) :150-169

[9]

Babin BJ, 2010, Multivariate data analysis, V7

[10] FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].

BARNEY, J .

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →