Totally Tubeless Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Cost

被引:35
作者
Choi, Sae Woong [1 ]
Kim, Kang Sup [1 ]
Kim, Jeong Ho [1 ]
Park, Yong Hyun [1 ]
Bae, Woong Jin [1 ]
Hong, Sung-Hoo [1 ]
Lee, Ji Youl [1 ]
Kim, Sae Woong [1 ]
Hwang, Tae-Kon [1 ]
Cho, Hyuk Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Urol, Coll Med, Seoul 137701, South Korea
关键词
NEPHROSTOLITHOTOMY; CALCULI;
D O I
10.1089/end.2014.0421
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness of a totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) by comparing the clinical outcomes and cost analysis between standard PCNL and totally tubeless PCNL for renal stones. Patients and Methods: From June 2012 to September 2013, a total of 121 patients with renal stones who underwent totally tubeless or standard PCNL by two experienced surgeons were retrospectively evaluated by group. According to the surgeon's preference for the nephrostomy tube and/or ureteral stent, the present study was designed to be divided into Group 1 and Group 2. Group 1 was performed by one surgeon (H.J. Cho) who preferred a totally tubeless PCNL and Group 2 was performed by the other surgeon (S.H. Hong) who preferred a standard PCNL. We excluded bilateral renal stones, multiple approach, whole staghorn calculi, and previous renal surgery. Patient and stone characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative parameters, and cost analysis were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the patient demographics between groups. Mean stone burden was 501.5 +/- 361.1 mm(2) in Group 1 v 535.2 +/- 353.1 mm(2) in Group 2 (P=0.651). Length of hospital stay (1.72 +/- 0.58 v 4.10 +/- 1.88 days, P<0.001), postoperative pain scores using a visual analog scale (day 0: P<0.001, day 1: P=0.002), and analgesia requirements (33.2 +/- 21.3 v 45.2 +/- 19.5 mg, P=0.005) for Group 1 v Group 2 showed significant differences. The stone-free rate was 86.4% v 89.8% in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P=0.609). There were no significant differences in overall complications between groups (P=0.213). Mean total medical treatment costs in Groups 1 and 2 were 2398.22 +/- 549.1 USD and 2845.70 +/- 824.2 USD, respectively (P=0.002). Conclusions: Many clinical outcomes in the totally tubeless PCNL showed comparable or better results than standard PCNL. We believe that totally tubeless PCNL is an acceptable, safe, and cost-effective alternative to standard PCNL for the treatment of renal stones.
引用
收藏
页码:1487 / 1494
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[21]   Extending the application of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotorny [J].
Sofer, Mario ;
Beri, Avi ;
Friedman, Alan ;
Aviram, Galit ;
Mabjeesh, Nicola J. ;
Chen, Juza ;
Ben-Chaim, Jacob ;
Greenstein, Alexander ;
Matzkin, Haim .
UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (03) :412-416
[22]   Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: How can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine? [J].
Tiselius, HG ;
Andersson, A .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (03) :275-281
[23]   Clinical significance of detrusor sphincter dyssynergia type in patients with post-traumatic spinal cord injury [J].
Weld, KJ ;
Graney, MJ ;
Dmochowski, RR .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (04) :565-568
[24]   Total Tubeless Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Zhong, Qiang ;
Zheng, Changjian ;
Mo, Junfu ;
Piao, Yongyi ;
Zhou, Yu ;
Jiang, Qing .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (04) :420-426