What quality-of-life issues do women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) consider important when making treatment decisions?

被引:18
作者
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
King, Madeleine T. [1 ,2 ]
Boxer, Miriam M. [3 ,4 ]
Spillane, Andrew [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Winters, Zoe E. [9 ]
Butow, Phyllis N. [2 ,10 ]
McPherson, Joan [11 ]
Rutherford, Claudia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Cent Clin Sch, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Psychooncol Cooperat Res Grp, Qual Life Off, Level 6 North,Lifehouse C39Z, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Liverpool Hosp, Liverpool Canc Therapy Ctr, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, South Western Sydney Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Northern Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Poche Ctr, Breast & Surg Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Mater Hosp Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Royal North Shore Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ Bristol, Breast Canc Surg Patient Reported & Clin Outcomes, Sch Clin Sci, Southmead Hosp, Bristol, Avon, England
[10] Univ Sydney, Ctr Med Psychol & Evidence Based Decis Making CeM, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] Breast Canc Network Australia, Camberwell, Vic, Australia
关键词
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); Decision making; Quality of life; Patient-reported outcomes; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; BREAST-CANCER; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MORBIDITY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; NEW-ZEALAND; RECONSTRUCTION; RISK; INSTRUMENT; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1007/s12282-017-0765-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To explore quality-of-life (QOL) issues considered important when deciding on treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Breast Cancer Network of Australia members diagnosed with DCIS in the past 5 years (self-identified) participated in an online survey (Sep-Nov 2015). From a list of 74 QOL issues, participants selected all issues they experienced during DCIS diagnosis, treatment or recovery, then the issues they felt important to making a DCIS treatment decision, and completed the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Associations between QOL issues and self-reported treatment received were assessed with chi (2) tests. The primary analysis included 38 participants treated with breast-conserving surgery (n = 15), mastectomy (n = 23), and/or radiotherapy (n = 14). Fatigue-related symptoms (82%) and "fear of progression" (50%) were the most frequently-experienced issues. When deciding on DCIS treatment, the most important consideration was "fear of progression" (50%). A higher proportion of mastectomy (compared to non-mastectomy) patients considered "difficultly looking at yourself naked" (p = 0.03). Radiotherapy (compared to non-radiotherapy) patients were more likely to consider "feeling unwell" important (p = 0.006). Results were similar in a sensitivity analysis involving all 101 respondents (i.e., including 63 respondents who reported receiving chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and/or Herceptin, suggesting that they may have been treated for invasive breast cancer). Health literacy was high across all nine HLQ scales. Fear of progression is a key consideration in DCIS treatment decision making for women with high health literacy. QOL treatment considerations differed by treatments received. Women diagnosed with DCIS may benefit from evidence about QOL to inform treatment decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 729
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): Raising Signposts on an III-Marked Treatment Path [J].
Elmore, Joann G. ;
Fenton, Joshua J. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2012, 104 (08) :569-571
[12]   Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ - The LORD study [J].
Elshof, Lotte E. ;
Tryfonidis, Konstantinos ;
Slaets, Leen ;
van Leeuwen-Stok, A. Elise ;
Skinner, Victoria P. ;
Dif, Nicolas ;
Pijnappel, Ruud M. ;
Bijker, Nina ;
Rutgers, Emiel J. Th. ;
Wesseling, Jelle .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (12) :1497-1510
[13]   Setting a Research Agenda for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ That Meets the Current Need for Change [J].
Esserman, Laura ;
Alvarado, Michael .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (07) :511-+
[14]   Low grade Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS): How best to describe it? [J].
Fallowfield, Lesley ;
Matthews, Lucy ;
Francis, Adele ;
Jenkins, Valerie ;
Rea, Daniel .
BREAST, 2014, 23 (05) :693-696
[15]   Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial [J].
Francis, Adele ;
Thomas, Jeremy ;
Fallowfield, Lesley ;
Wallis, Matthew ;
Bartlett, John M. S. ;
Brookes, Cassandra ;
Roberts, Tracy ;
Pirrie, Sarah ;
Gaunt, Claire ;
Young, Jennie ;
Billingham, Lucinda ;
Dodwell, David ;
Hanby, Andrew ;
Pinder, Sarah E. ;
Evans, Andrew ;
Reed, Malcolm ;
Jenkins, Valerie ;
Matthews, Lucy ;
Wilcox, Maggie ;
Fairbrother, Patricia ;
Bowden, Sarah ;
Rea, Daniel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (16) :2296-2303
[16]  
Hwang S., 2016, COMP OPERATIVE VERSU
[17]   The challenge of being diagnosed and treated for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) [J].
Kennedy, Fiona ;
Harcourt, Diana ;
Rumsey, Nichola .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2008, 12 (02) :103-111
[18]   Ductal carcinoma in situ: treatment or active surveillance? [J].
Kuerer, Henry M. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2015, 15 (07) :777-785
[19]  
National Health and Medical Research Council, 2001, NHMRC CLIN PRACT GUI
[20]   Health promotion glossary [J].
Nutbeam, D .
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 13 (04) :349-364