Directional Delay Spread and Interference Quotient Analysis in sub-7GHz Wi-Fi bands

被引:4
作者
Gomez-Ponce, Jorge [1 ,2 ]
Burghal, Daoud [1 ]
Abbasi, Naveed A. [1 ]
Hariharan, Arjun [1 ]
Jakhetia, Gopal [1 ]
Chaganlal, Praveen [1 ]
Molisch, Andreas F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] FSPOL Polytech Univ, Escuela Super Politecn Litoral, ESPOL, Fac Ingn Elect & Comp, Km 30-5 Via Perimetral,POB 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador
来源
2020 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM) | 2020年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9322252
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Delay dispersion is one of the key propagation channel characteristics that impact system design and performance. In particular, for OFDM-based systems such as Wi-Fi, it determines both the amount of available frequency diversity and the minimum required cyclic prefix, which in turn impacts the spectral efficiency. For this reason, delay spread and power delay profiles have been analyzed for a long time. However, recent upgrades in Wi-Fi, in particular the addition of a new frequency range (6-7.1 GHz), and the introduction of adaptive beamforming, require a re-assessment based on new measurements. This paper presents extensive measurement results of RMS delay spread and interference quotient that take these developments into account. Results were measured in the 2.4-2.5, 5-6, and 6-7 GHz bands. Furthermore, we compare the "omni-directional" delay spread and interference quotient (i.e., when measured with omniantennas at transmitter and receiver), to those that occur when beamformed antennas are used. We found that for both outdoor and indoor environments, beamlarming typically improves the interference quotient (for a given window size) by about 3-5 dB. The 2.4 and 5-7 GHz bands show a significant difference, while we could not observe statistically significant differences between the 5-6 and 6-7 GHz bands.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Dabin JA, 2003, 2003 IEEE CONFERENCE ON ULTRA WIDEBAND SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P305
[2]  
Hammoudeh A., 2003, 5th European Personal Mobile Communications Conference 2003 (IEE Conf. Publ. 492), P406, DOI 10.1049/cp:20030287
[3]   A Framework to Maximize the Capacity of 5G Systems for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications [J].
Khorov, Evgeny ;
Krasilov, Artem ;
Selnitskiy, Ilya ;
Akyildiz, Ian F. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, 2021, 20 (06) :2111-2123
[4]   The Influence of C3A Content in Cement on the Chloride Transport [J].
Kim, Min Jae ;
Kim, Ki Beom ;
Ann, Ki Yong .
ADVANCES IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016
[5]  
Kim MD, 2015, 2015 IEEE 26TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERSONAL, INDOOR, AND MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS (PIMRC), P403, DOI 10.1109/PIMRC.2015.7343332
[6]   Indoor Office Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models at 28 and 73 GHz for Ultra-Dense 5G Wireless Networks [J].
MacCartney, George R. ;
Rappaport, Theodore S. ;
Sun, Shu ;
Deng, Sijia .
IEEE ACCESS, 2015, 3 :2388-2424
[7]  
MacCartney GR, 2015, IEEE ICC, P2416, DOI 10.1109/ICC.2015.7248687
[8]  
Molisch A. F., 2011, Wireless Communications, V2nd
[9]  
Pettersen M., 1999, Gateway to 21st Century Communications Village. VTC 1999-Fall. IEEE VTS 50th Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.99CH36324), P1454, DOI 10.1109/VETECF.1999.801503
[10]  
Simonsson A., 2018, 2018 IEEE 87th Vehic. Technology Conf. (VTC Spring), P1