Making online learning more satisfying: The effects of online-learning self-efficacy, social presence, and content structure

被引:35
作者
Lim, Jun Rong Nigel [1 ]
Rosenthal, Sonny [2 ]
Sim, Ye Jun Marcius [3 ]
Lim, Zhao-Yi [3 ]
Oh, Kai Rong [3 ]
机构
[1] Analytix Online Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Wee Kim Wee Sch Commun, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Minist Commun & Informat, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Online learning; learning satisfaction; instructor presence; self-efficacy; content structure; STUDENT SATISFACTION; INSTRUCTOR PRESENCE; DISCIPLINARY DIFFERENCES; BLOOMS TAXONOMY; EXPERIENCES; PERCEPTION; ENGAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; ATTENTION; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1080/1475939X.2021.1934102
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examines the effects of instructor presence and online learning self-efficacy on learning satisfaction, and how the effect of social presence may depend on content structure. In this study, undergraduate students in Singapore rated their online learning self-efficacy. Then they rated their learning satisfaction after watching each of four video lectures in a 2 (low versus high instructor presence) x 2 (low versus high content structure) repeated measures experiment. Findings show that learning satisfaction is related to instructor presence and online learning self-efficacy and that the effect of instructor presence is stronger for unstructured than for structured content. This study contributes to research on pedagogy and online learning by clarifying when and how instructor presence enhances learning outcomes. Although most kinds of instruction can benefit from higher levels of instructor presence, there is the greatest benefit for unstructured content, where teaching and learning involve a more interpretive process.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 556
页数:14
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Al-Harthi A.S., 2005, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, V6, DOI [10.19173/irrodl.v6i3.263, DOI 10.19173/IRRODL.V6I3.263]
[2]  
Allen I.E., 2010, Class Differences Online Education in the United States, 2010
[3]  
Allen I. Elaine., 2016, Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States
[4]   A Randomized Assessment of Online Learning [J].
Alpert, William T. ;
Couch, Kenneth A. ;
Harmon, Oskar R. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (05) :378-382
[5]  
Alqurashi E., 2016, Contemporary Issues in Education Research (Online), V9, P45, DOI [10.19030/cier.v9i1.9549, DOI 10.19030/CIER.V9I1.9549]
[6]   Does academic discipline moderate CoI-course outcomes relationships in online MBA courses? [J].
Arbaugh, J. B. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 17 :16-28
[7]   Sage, guide, both, or even more? An examination of instructor activity in online MBA courses [J].
Arbaugh, J. B. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 55 (03) :1234-1244
[8]   Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study [J].
Arbaugh, J. B. ;
Bangert, Arthur ;
Cleveland-Innes, Martha .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (1-2) :37-44
[9]   Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: predicting satisfaction with online training [J].
Artino, A. R. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2008, 24 (03) :260-270
[10]   DEVELOPMENT AND INITIAL VALIDATION OF THE ONLINE LEARNING VALUE AND SELF-EFFICACY SCALE [J].
Artino, Anthony R., Jr. ;
Mccoach, D. Betsy .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2008, 38 (03) :279-303