Meta-analysis of the FDA Reports on Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the Three Latest Platforms for LASIK

被引:20
作者
Moshirfar, Majid [1 ,2 ]
Shah, Tirth J. [3 ]
Skanchy, David Franklin [4 ]
Linn, Steve H. [1 ]
Durrie, Daniel S. [5 ]
机构
[1] Hoopes Vis, HDR Res Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, John A Moran Eye Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Coll Med Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Durrie Vis, Kansas City, KS USA
关键词
VISUAL SYMPTOMS; EYE;
D O I
10.3928/1081597X-20161221-02
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of the three latest U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved lasers on patient-reported outcomes after LASIK. METHODS: In this meta-analysis of patient-reported FDA data, an aggregated total of 718 eyes undergoing LASIK using VISX iDesign (Abbott Medical Optics Manufacturing, Milpitas, CA), Alcon Contoura (Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, TX), and Nidek CATz (Nidek Co. Ltd., Gamagori, Japan) lasers were evaluated for overall changes in visual symptoms postoperatively. Statistical significance was calculated when appropriate to assess changes. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: At 12 months following LASIK, there was a decrease in the postoperative difficulty driving at night (29%) with respect to preoperative values. There was a significant postoperative reduction in prior moderate to severe symptoms for light sensitivity (9%), difficulty driving at night (22%), reading difficulty (8%), double vision (2%), glare (12%), and halos (6%) at 12 months following LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the FDA data shows that modern lasers have significantly improved patient-reported visual outcomes after LASIK.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Outcomes of LASIK for myopia with FDA-approved lasers
    Bailey, Melissa D.
    Zadnik, Karla
    [J]. CORNEA, 2007, 26 (03) : 246 - 254
  • [2] Chronic dry eye in photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: Manifestations, incidence, and predictive factors
    Bower, Kraig S.
    Sia, Rose K.
    Ryan, Denise S.
    Mines, Michael J.
    Dartt, Darlene A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (12) : 2624 - 2634
  • [3] Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography
    Chalita, MR
    Chavala, S
    Xu, M
    Krueger, RR
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 111 (03) : 447 - 453
  • [4] Topography-guided Transepithelial Surface Ablation in Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ingrowths
    Chen, Xiangjun
    Stojanovic, Aleksandar
    Nitter, Tore A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 26 (07) : 529 - 532
  • [5] A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight (R) Allegretto Waver (R) Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue (TM) STAR S4 IR (TM) in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
    Moshirfar, Majid
    Betts, Brent S.
    Churgin, Daniel S.
    Hsu, Maylon
    Neuffer, Marcus
    Sikder, Shameema
    Church, Dane
    Mifflin, Mark D.
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 5 : 1339 - 1347
  • [6] Topography-guided laser refractive surgery
    Pasquali, Theodore
    Krueger, Ronald
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 23 (04) : 264 - 268
  • [7] Sharma M, 2007, J REFRACT SURG, V23, P252
  • [8] LASIK World Literature Review Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction
    Solomon, Kerry D.
    Fernandez de Castro, Luis E.
    Sandoval, Helga P.
    Biber, Joseph M.
    Groat, Brian
    Neff, Kristiana D.
    Ying, Michelle S.
    French, John W.
    Donnenfeld, Eric D.
    Lindstrom, Richard L.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 116 (04) : 691 - 701
  • [9] Stonecipher Karl G, 2008, J Refract Surg, V24, pS424, DOI 10.3928/1081597X-20080401-20
  • [10] United States Food and Drug Administration, P930016S044 US FDA