Associations between prior HPV4 vaccine doses and cervical cancer screening participation

被引:16
作者
Boone, Stephanie D. [1 ]
Pinkston, Christina M. [2 ]
Baumgartner, Kathy B. [1 ]
Baumgartner, Richard N. [1 ]
Harper, Sean M. [3 ]
Bonham, Aaron J. [4 ]
Paynter, Christopher A. [4 ]
Harper, Diane M. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Publ Hlth & Informat Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, James Graham Brown Canc Ctr, 485 E Gray St, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Sch Publ Hlth & Informat Sci, Dept Bioinformat & Biostat, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Dept Math, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[5] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Community & Geriatr Med, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[6] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[7] Univ Louisville, Sch Publ Hlth & Informat Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[8] Univ Louisville, Sch Publ Hlth & Informat Sci, Dept Hlth Promot & Behav Hlth Sci, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[9] Univ Louisville, Sch Engn, Dept Bioengn, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
关键词
Cervical cancer screening; Gardasil; Cervarix; HPV vaccine; Cox proportional hazards; Compliance; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINATION; UNITED-STATES; YOUNG-WOMEN; BEHAVIOR; LESIONS; GIRLS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2016.04.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Cervical cancer screening, regardless of HPV vaccination, is a cornerstone of cancer prevention. This study evaluated associations between prior HPV vaccine doses and initiation and continued participation of screening by age at vaccination. Methods: Using electronic medical records for a safety net healthcare system (Truman Medical Center), women aged 14-26 y vaccinated (n = 1123) between 07/01/2006 and 10/1/2009 were randomly selected and matched on birth year and health campus to unvaccinated (n = 1123) women. Frequency of screening was determined through 07/01/2013. Hazard ratios (HR) for screening were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Screening rates were higher after vaccination: unvaccinated (53%), first (62%), second (59%) or third (61%) doses. Women who initiated screening were less likely to complete the vaccine series, regardless of age. Women receiving one dose were more likely than unvaccinated women to initiate screening (HR = 2.98 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.45-3.61) and were more likely to screen than those receiving two (1 vs. 2, HR = 2.94 95% CI: 2.09-4.14) or three doses (1 vs. 3, HR = 3.15 95% CI: 2.21-4.48). Compared to unvaccinated women, women < 21 y who completed 3-doses were 1.8-times more likely to screen at >= 21 y, whereas vaccinated women >= 21 y were more likely to screen regardless of number of doses (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Women who were vaccinated were more likely to screen than unvaccinated women; screening rate was highest after and occurred closest to the first vaccine dose. Research evaluating the efficacy of a one-dose vaccine is warranted and may provide both higher vaccination and screening rates. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 114
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Intent to Participate in Future Cervical Cancer Screenings Is Lower when Satisfaction with the Decision to Be Vaccinated Is Neutral [J].
Alexander, Natalie Marya ;
Harper, Diane Medved ;
Comes, Johanna Claire ;
Smith, Melissa Smith ;
Heutinck, Melinda Ann ;
Handley, Sandra Martin ;
Ahern, Debra Ann .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06)
[2]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), 2012, OBSTET GYNECOL, V120, P1222, DOI DOI 10.1097/AOG.0B013E318277C92A
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V113, P1190, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a6d022
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SURVIVAL ANAL
[5]   Adherence to cervical screening in the era of human papillomavirus vaccination: how low is too low? [J].
Bauch, Chris T. ;
Li, Meng ;
Chapman, Gretchen ;
Galvani, Alison P. .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 10 (02) :133-137
[6]   Does the HPV vaccination programme have implications for cervical screening programmes in the UK? [J].
Beer, Helen ;
Hibbitts, Sam ;
Brophy, Sinead ;
Rahman, M. A. ;
Waller, Jo ;
Paranjothy, Shantini .
VACCINE, 2014, 32 (16) :1828-1833
[7]   Association between human papillomavirus vaccine status and other cervical cancer risk factors [J].
Bowyer, Harriet L. ;
Dodd, Rachael H. ;
Marlow, Laura A. V. ;
Waller, Jo .
VACCINE, 2014, 32 (34) :4310-4316
[8]   Will vaccinated women attend cervical screening? A population based survey of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening among young women in Victoria, Australia [J].
Brotherton, Julia M. L. ;
Mullins, Robyn M. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 36 (03) :298-302
[9]   Cervical, screening rates for women vaccinated against human papillomavirus [J].
Budd, Alison C. ;
Brotherton, Julia M. L. ;
Gertig, Dorota M. ;
Chau, Theresa ;
Drennan, Kelly T. ;
Saville, Marion .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2014, 201 (05) :279-282
[10]   SELF REFERRAL FOR CANCER TESTS Will self referral for cancer tests result in better mortality outcomes or yet more activity among the worried well? [J].
Byatt, Kit .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350