Associations between prior HPV4 vaccine doses and cervical cancer screening participation

被引:14
作者
Boone, Stephanie D. [1 ]
Pinkston, Christina M. [2 ]
Baumgartner, Kathy B. [1 ]
Baumgartner, Richard N. [1 ]
Harper, Sean M. [3 ]
Bonham, Aaron J. [4 ]
Paynter, Christopher A. [4 ]
Harper, Diane M. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Publ Hlth & Informat Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, James Graham Brown Canc Ctr, 485 E Gray St, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Sch Publ Hlth & Informat Sci, Dept Bioinformat & Biostat, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Dept Math, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[5] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Community & Geriatr Med, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[6] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[7] Univ Louisville, Sch Publ Hlth & Informat Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[8] Univ Louisville, Sch Publ Hlth & Informat Sci, Dept Hlth Promot & Behav Hlth Sci, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[9] Univ Louisville, Sch Engn, Dept Bioengn, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
关键词
Cervical cancer screening; Gardasil; Cervarix; HPV vaccine; Cox proportional hazards; Compliance; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINATION; UNITED-STATES; YOUNG-WOMEN; BEHAVIOR; LESIONS; GIRLS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2016.04.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Cervical cancer screening, regardless of HPV vaccination, is a cornerstone of cancer prevention. This study evaluated associations between prior HPV vaccine doses and initiation and continued participation of screening by age at vaccination. Methods: Using electronic medical records for a safety net healthcare system (Truman Medical Center), women aged 14-26 y vaccinated (n = 1123) between 07/01/2006 and 10/1/2009 were randomly selected and matched on birth year and health campus to unvaccinated (n = 1123) women. Frequency of screening was determined through 07/01/2013. Hazard ratios (HR) for screening were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Screening rates were higher after vaccination: unvaccinated (53%), first (62%), second (59%) or third (61%) doses. Women who initiated screening were less likely to complete the vaccine series, regardless of age. Women receiving one dose were more likely than unvaccinated women to initiate screening (HR = 2.98 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.45-3.61) and were more likely to screen than those receiving two (1 vs. 2, HR = 2.94 95% CI: 2.09-4.14) or three doses (1 vs. 3, HR = 3.15 95% CI: 2.21-4.48). Compared to unvaccinated women, women < 21 y who completed 3-doses were 1.8-times more likely to screen at >= 21 y, whereas vaccinated women >= 21 y were more likely to screen regardless of number of doses (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Women who were vaccinated were more likely to screen than unvaccinated women; screening rate was highest after and occurred closest to the first vaccine dose. Research evaluating the efficacy of a one-dose vaccine is warranted and may provide both higher vaccination and screening rates. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 114
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Intent to Participate in Future Cervical Cancer Screenings Is Lower when Satisfaction with the Decision to Be Vaccinated Is Neutral
    Alexander, Natalie Marya
    Harper, Diane Medved
    Comes, Johanna Claire
    Smith, Melissa Smith
    Heutinck, Melinda Ann
    Handley, Sandra Martin
    Ahern, Debra Ann
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [2] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), 2012, OBSTET GYNECOL, V120, P1222, DOI DOI 10.1097/AOG.0B013E318277C92A
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V113, P1190, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a6d022
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, SURVIVAL ANAL
  • [5] Adherence to cervical screening in the era of human papillomavirus vaccination: how low is too low?
    Bauch, Chris T.
    Li, Meng
    Chapman, Gretchen
    Galvani, Alison P.
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 10 (02) : 133 - 137
  • [6] Does the HPV vaccination programme have implications for cervical screening programmes in the UK?
    Beer, Helen
    Hibbitts, Sam
    Brophy, Sinead
    Rahman, M. A.
    Waller, Jo
    Paranjothy, Shantini
    [J]. VACCINE, 2014, 32 (16) : 1828 - 1833
  • [7] Association between human papillomavirus vaccine status and other cervical cancer risk factors
    Bowyer, Harriet L.
    Dodd, Rachael H.
    Marlow, Laura A. V.
    Waller, Jo
    [J]. VACCINE, 2014, 32 (34) : 4310 - 4316
  • [8] Will vaccinated women attend cervical screening? A population based survey of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening among young women in Victoria, Australia
    Brotherton, Julia M. L.
    Mullins, Robyn M.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 36 (03) : 298 - 302
  • [9] Cervical, screening rates for women vaccinated against human papillomavirus
    Budd, Alison C.
    Brotherton, Julia M. L.
    Gertig, Dorota M.
    Chau, Theresa
    Drennan, Kelly T.
    Saville, Marion
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2014, 201 (05) : 279 - 282
  • [10] SELF REFERRAL FOR CANCER TESTS Will self referral for cancer tests result in better mortality outcomes or yet more activity among the worried well?
    Byatt, Kit
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350