Implementing computerized adaptative test

被引:1
作者
Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Fac Ciencias Med, Dept Psicol Med & Psiquiatria, Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Medical education; educational assessment; computerized adaptive test;
D O I
10.15448/1980-6108.2019.3.34432
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Traditionally, the assessment of knowledge consists of items, who students answered the same items at the same time, such as test of a specific subject. This assessment may be considered too easy or difficulty by the student. In both cases, the test is likely to be boring by the students and it may provide little information on students' knowledge level. One way of solving this problem is by creating tailored tests for each student, considering that the next question will be selected based on students' performance on previous items. This type of test is known as computerized adaptative test. Computerized adaptative test provides both educational and psychometrics advantages compared to the traditional paper-pen testing. Computerized adaptative test requires less items than the traditional test, which in turns will decrease students' fatigue, and optimizing learning. Furthermore, computerized adaptative test is designed for each student, considering the level of difficulty of each item. This makes the teste more attractive and authentic, since the items will be always aligned with the level of students' knowledge. Since computerized adaptative test requires both the difficulty of the item and students' ability, it requires the use of Item Response Theory, which establish a relation between difficulty of the item, students' ability and the probability of answering a question correctly. Although the implementation of computerized adaptative test is complex, computerized adaptative test has a higher standard in both psychometric point of view and the alignment with modern theories of learning. Because of the high complexity, the implementation of computerized adaptative test is usually in high-stakes test and large scale. However. the new educational paradigm in which requires tailored-made education respecting the pace of each student, the computerized adaptative test will be more used over time.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1956, HDB 1 COGNITIVE DOMA
  • [2] TASK-EVOKED PUPILLARY RESPONSES, PROCESSING LOAD, AND THE STRUCTURE OF PROCESSING RESOURCES
    BEATTY, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 91 (02) : 276 - 292
  • [3] Comparison of the level of cognitive processing between case-based items and non-case-based items on the Interuniversity Progress Test of Medicine in the Netherlands
    Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario
    Kerdijk, Wouter
    Bremers, Andreas Johannes
    Aalders, Wytze
    Tio, Rene Anton
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2018, 15 : 28
  • [4] Cecilio-Fernandes D, 2018, PHYS THER REV, V23, P17, DOI 10.1080/10833196.2017.1341143
  • [5] Comparison of formula and number-right scoring in undergraduate medical training: a Rasch model analysis
    Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario
    Medema, Harro
    Collares, Carlos Fernando
    Schuwirth, Lambert
    Cohen-Schotanus, Janke
    Tio, Rene A.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 17
  • [6] Development of cognitive processing and judgments of knowledge in medical students: Analysis of progress test results
    Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario
    Kerdijk, Wouter
    Jaarsma, A. D. C.
    Tio, Rene A.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2016, 38 (11) : 1125 - 1129
  • [7] Psychometrics Behind Computerized Adaptive Testing
    Chang, Hua-Hua
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2015, 80 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [8] When I say ... computerised adaptive testing
    Collares, Carlos Fernando
    Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 53 (02) : 115 - 116
  • [9] Linacre J. M., 1994, Rasch Measure. Transac, V7, P328
  • [10] Computer-Adaptive Testing: Implications for Students' Achievement, Motivation, Engagement, and Subjective Test Experience
    Martin, Andrew J.
    Lazendic, Goran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 110 (01) : 27 - 45