Prediction of Water Saturation from Well Log Data by Machine Learning Algorithms: Boosting and Super Learner

被引:24
|
作者
Hadavimoghaddam, Fahimeh [1 ]
Ostadhassan, Mehdi [2 ,3 ]
Sadri, Mohammad Ali [4 ]
Bondarenko, Tatiana [5 ]
Chebyshev, Igor [6 ]
Semnani, Amir [7 ]
机构
[1] Gubkin Natl Univ Oil & Gas, Dept Oil Field Dev & Operat, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] Northeast Petr Univ, Key Lab Continental Shale Hydrocarbon Accumulat &, Minist Educ, Daqing 163318, Peoples R China
[3] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Petr Engn, Tehran 1591634311, Iran
[4] Skolkovo Inst Sci & Technol Skoltech, Moscow 121205, Russia
[5] PetroGuide LLC, Moscow 143005, Russia
[6] Gazpromneft Sci & Technol Ctr, St Petersburg 190000, Russia
[7] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Geosci & Technol, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
关键词
well log DATA; water saturation; machine learning; boosting; super learner; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY;
D O I
10.3390/jmse9060666
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Intelligent predictive methods have the power to reliably estimate water saturation (S-w) compared to conventional experimental methods commonly performed by petrphysicists. However, due to nonlinearity and uncertainty in the data set, the prediction might not be accurate. There exist new machine learning (ML) algorithms such as gradient boosting techniques that have shown significant success in other disciplines yet have not been examined for S-w prediction or other reservoir or rock properties in the petroleum industry. To bridge the literature gap, in this study, for the first time, a total of five ML code programs that belong to the family of Super Learner along with boosting algorithms: XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, AdaBoost, are developed to predict water saturation without relying on the resistivity log data. This is important since conventional methods of water saturation prediction that rely on resistivity log can become problematic in particular formations such as shale or tight carbonates. Thus, to do so, two datasets were constructed by collecting several types of well logs (Gamma, density, neutron, sonic, PEF, and without PEF) to evaluate the robustness and accuracy of the models by comparing the results with laboratory-measured data. It was found that Super Learner and XGBoost produced the highest accurate output (R-2: 0.999 and 0.993, respectively), and with considerable distance, Catboost and LightGBM were ranked third and fourth, respectively. Ultimately, both XGBoost and Super Learner produced negligible errors but the latest is considered as the best amongst all.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Evolution of Boosting Algorithms From Machine Learning to Statistical Modelling
    Mayr, A.
    Binder, H.
    Gefeller, O.
    Schmid, M.
    METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2014, 53 (06) : 419 - 427
  • [22] An Extensive Analysis of Machine Learning Based Boosting Algorithms for Software Maintainability Prediction
    Gupta, Shikha
    Chug, Anuradha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 7 (02): : 89 - 109
  • [23] Super learner approach to predict total organic carbon using stacking machine learning models based on well logs
    Goliatt, L.
    Saporetti, C. M.
    Pereira, E.
    FUEL, 2023, 353
  • [24] Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms?
    Razieh Mirzaeian
    Raoof Nopour
    Zahra Asghari Varzaneh
    Mohsen Shafiee
    Mostafa Shanbehzadeh
    Hadi Kazemi-Arpanahi
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 22
  • [25] Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms?
    Mirzaeian, Razieh
    Nopour, Raoof
    Varzaneh, Zahra Asghari
    Shafiee, Mohsen
    Shanbehzadeh, Mostafa
    Kazemi-Arpanahi, Hadi
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [26] Identification of lithofacies from well log data in the upper Assam basin using machine learning techniques
    Das, Shikha
    Singha, Dip Kumar
    Mandal, Partha Pratim
    Agrahari, Shudha
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2024, 72 (05) : 3191 - 3210
  • [27] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Financial Data Prediction
    Omar, Bencharef
    Zineb, Bousbaa
    Jofre Aida, Cortes
    Cortes Daniel, Gonzalez
    2018 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ISAECT), 2018,
  • [28] Water quality prediction: A data-driven approach exploiting advanced machine learning algorithms with data augmentation
    Karthick, K.
    Krishnan, S.
    Manikandan, R.
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 15 (02) : 431 - 452
  • [29] Application of machine learning model in shale TOC content prediction based on well log data: enhancing model interpretability by SHAP
    Ruibin Chen
    Xinyu Liu
    Sandong Zhou
    Weixin Zhang
    Hang Liu
    Detian Yan
    Hua Wang
    Earth Science Informatics, 2025, 18 (2)
  • [30] Evaluation and Development of a Predictive Model for Geophysical Well Log Data Analysis and Reservoir Characterization: Machine Learning Applications to Lithology Prediction
    Aditya Mishra
    Anjali Sharma
    Atul Kumar Patidar
    Natural Resources Research, 2022, 31 : 3195 - 3222