Prediction of Water Saturation from Well Log Data by Machine Learning Algorithms: Boosting and Super Learner

被引:28
作者
Hadavimoghaddam, Fahimeh [1 ]
Ostadhassan, Mehdi [2 ,3 ]
Sadri, Mohammad Ali [4 ]
Bondarenko, Tatiana [5 ]
Chebyshev, Igor [6 ]
Semnani, Amir [7 ]
机构
[1] Gubkin Natl Univ Oil & Gas, Dept Oil Field Dev & Operat, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] Northeast Petr Univ, Key Lab Continental Shale Hydrocarbon Accumulat &, Minist Educ, Daqing 163318, Peoples R China
[3] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Petr Engn, Tehran 1591634311, Iran
[4] Skolkovo Inst Sci & Technol Skoltech, Moscow 121205, Russia
[5] PetroGuide LLC, Moscow 143005, Russia
[6] Gazpromneft Sci & Technol Ctr, St Petersburg 190000, Russia
[7] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Geosci & Technol, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
关键词
well log DATA; water saturation; machine learning; boosting; super learner; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY;
D O I
10.3390/jmse9060666
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Intelligent predictive methods have the power to reliably estimate water saturation (S-w) compared to conventional experimental methods commonly performed by petrphysicists. However, due to nonlinearity and uncertainty in the data set, the prediction might not be accurate. There exist new machine learning (ML) algorithms such as gradient boosting techniques that have shown significant success in other disciplines yet have not been examined for S-w prediction or other reservoir or rock properties in the petroleum industry. To bridge the literature gap, in this study, for the first time, a total of five ML code programs that belong to the family of Super Learner along with boosting algorithms: XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, AdaBoost, are developed to predict water saturation without relying on the resistivity log data. This is important since conventional methods of water saturation prediction that rely on resistivity log can become problematic in particular formations such as shale or tight carbonates. Thus, to do so, two datasets were constructed by collecting several types of well logs (Gamma, density, neutron, sonic, PEF, and without PEF) to evaluate the robustness and accuracy of the models by comparing the results with laboratory-measured data. It was found that Super Learner and XGBoost produced the highest accurate output (R-2: 0.999 and 0.993, respectively), and with considerable distance, Catboost and LightGBM were ranked third and fourth, respectively. Ultimately, both XGBoost and Super Learner produced negligible errors but the latest is considered as the best amongst all.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Integrated petrophysical and reservoir characterization workflow to enhance permeability and water saturation prediction [J].
Al-Amri, Meshal ;
Mahmoud, Mohamed ;
Elkatatny, Salaheldin ;
Al-Yousef, Hasan ;
Al-Ghamdi, Tariq .
JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 131 :105-116
[2]   Development of artificial neural network models for predicting water saturation and fluid distribution [J].
Al-Bulushi, Nabil ;
King, Peter R. ;
Blunt, Martin J. ;
Kraaijveld, Martin .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 68 (3-4) :197-208
[3]  
Al-Mudhafar W., 2016, P MS OFFSH TECHN C H
[4]   Integrating machine learning and data analytics for geostatistical characterization of clastic reservoirs [J].
Al-Mudhafar, Watheq J. .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 195
[5]  
Alimoradi A., 2011, J Petroleum Gas Eng, V2, P45
[6]  
Aliouane L, 2012, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V7667, P730, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-34500-5_86
[7]  
Amyx J.W., 1960, Petroleum Reservoir Engineering: Physical properties
[8]  
Anifowose F., 2012, P IPTC 2012 INT PETR
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ARXIV170609516
[10]  
ARCHIE GE, 1952, AAPG BULL, V36, P278