Democratizing cognitive technology: a proactive approach

被引:13
作者
Ienca, Marcello [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Hlth Eth & Policy Lab, Mauer 17, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Inst Biomed Eth, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Cognitive technology; Democratization; Open source; Open access; Neurotechnology; Artificial intelligence; Ethics; Governance; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE; USER-CENTERED DESIGN; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; PRIORITIES; ETHICS; TIME; CARE; LIE;
D O I
10.1007/s10676-018-9453-9
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Cognitive technology is an umbrella term sometimes used to designate the realm of technologies that assist, augment or simulate cognitive processes or that can be used for the achievement of cognitive aims. This technological macro-domain encompasses both devices that directly interface the human brain as well as external systems that use artificial intelligence to simulate or assist (aspects of) human cognition. As they hold the promise of assisting and augmenting human cognitive capabilities both individually and collectively, cognitive technologies could produce, in the next decades, a significant effect on human cultural evolution. At the same time, due to their dual-use potential, they are vulnerable to being coopted by State and non-State actors for non-benign purposes (e.g. cyberterrorism, cyberwarfare and mass surveillance) or in manners that violate democratic values and principles. Therefore, it is the responsibility of technology governance bodies to align the future of cognitive technology with democratic principles such as individual freedom, avoidance of centralized, equality of opportunity and open development. This paper provides a preliminary description of an approach to the democratization of cognitive technologies based on six normative ethical principles: avoidance of centralized control, openness, transparency, inclusiveness, user-centeredness and convergence. This approach is designed to universalize and evenly distribute the potential benefits of cognitive technology and mitigate the risk that such emerging technological trend could be coopted by State or non-State actors in ways that are inconsistent with the principles of liberal democracy or detrimental to individuals and groups.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 280
页数:14
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GLOB RISKS REP 2016
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT BUSINESS TIMES
[3]  
[Anonymous], GLOBAL CATASTROPHIC
[4]  
Beynon M., 2003, 4 INT C CT 2001 COV, V2117
[5]   Strategic Implications of Openness in AI Development [J].
Bostrom, Nick .
GLOBAL POLICY, 2017, 8 (02) :135-148
[6]   Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges [J].
Bostrom, Nick ;
Sandberg, Anders .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2009, 15 (03) :311-341
[7]  
Bostrom Nick, 2016, Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies
[8]   Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke [J].
Buch, Ethan ;
Weber, Cornelia ;
Cohen, Leonardo G. ;
Braun, Christoph ;
Dimyan, Michael A. ;
Ard, Tyler ;
Mellinger, Jurgen ;
Caria, Andrea ;
Soekadar, Surjo ;
Fourkas, Alissa ;
Birbaumer, Niels .
STROKE, 2008, 39 (03) :910-917
[9]  
Callam A, 2015, INT AFFAIRS REV, V18, P122
[10]  
Cavuoto J., 2012, REGULATORY EFFICACY