Gut wall bacteria of earthworms: a natural selection process

被引:177
作者
Thakuria, Dwipendra [1 ]
Schmidt, Olaf [1 ]
Finan, Dillon [1 ]
Egan, Damian [1 ]
Doohan, Fiona M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Sch Biol & Environm Sci, Sci Educ & Res Ctr W, Dublin 2, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
ecological group; intestinal microbiology; invertebrate; lumbricidae; soil fauna; LUMBRICUS-TERRESTRIS; SOIL; DIVERSITY; SYMBIONTS; COMMUNITIES; MICROFLORA; GROWTH; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1038/ismej.2009.124
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Earthworms and microorganisms are interdependent and their interactions regulate the biogeochemistry of terrestrial soils. Investigating earthworm-microorganism interactions, we tested the hypothesis that differences in burrowing and feeding habits of anecic and endogeic earthworms are reflected by the existence of ecological group-specific gut wall bacterial communities. Bacterial community was detected using automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of 16S and 23S genes and ribotype data was used to assess diversity and community composition. Using soil and earthworm samples collected from adjacent wheat-barley and grass-clover fields, we found that the anecic Lumbricus terrestris and L. friendi, the endogeic Aporrectodea caliginosa and A. longa (classically defined as anecic, but now known to possess endogeic characteristics) contain ecological group-specific gut wall-associated bacterial communities. The abundance of specific gut wall-associated bacteria (identified by sequence analysis of ribotype bands), including Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and an actinobacterium, was ecological group dependent. A microcosm study, conducted using A. caliginosa and L. terrestris and five different feeding regimes, indicated that food resource can cause shifts in gut wall-associated bacterial community, but the magnitude of these shifts did not obscure the delineation between ecological group specificity. Using A. caliginosa and A. longa samples collected in six different arable fields, we deduced that, within an ecological group, habitat was a more important determinant of gut wall-associated bacterial community composition than was host species. Hence, we conclude that the selection of bacteria associated with the gut wall of earthworms is a natural selection process and the strongest determinant of this process is in the order ecological group>habitat>species. The ISME Journal (2010) 4, 357-366; doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.124; published online 19 November 2009
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 366
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   BASIC LOCAL ALIGNMENT SEARCH TOOL [J].
ALTSCHUL, SF ;
GISH, W ;
MILLER, W ;
MYERS, EW ;
LIPMAN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 215 (03) :403-410
[2]  
Bouche M. B., 1977, Ecological Bulletins (Stockholm), P122
[3]  
BREIDENBACH J, 2002, THESIS U MUENSTER GE, P253
[4]  
Bright M, 2005, SYMBIOSIS, V38, P1
[5]  
Briones MJI, 2004, REC RES DEV CROP SCI, V1, P11
[6]   Earthworm ecological groupings based on 14C analysis [J].
Briones, MJI ;
Garnett, MH ;
Piearce, TG .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 37 (11) :2145-2149
[7]  
Brown George G., 2004, P213
[8]   Regulation of soil organic matter dynamics and microbial activity in the drilosphere and the role of interactions with other edaphic functional domains [J].
Brown, GG ;
Barois, I ;
Lavelle, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (3-4) :177-198
[9]   Using ecosystem engineers to restore ecological systems [J].
Byers, James E. ;
Cuddington, Kim ;
Jones, Clive G. ;
Talley, Theresa S. ;
Hastings, Alan ;
Lambrinos, John G. ;
Crooks, Jeffrey A. ;
Wilson, William G. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2006, 21 (09) :493-500
[10]   Comparison of different primer sets for use in automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of complex bacterial communities [J].
Cardinale, M ;
Brusetti, L ;
Quatrini, P ;
Borin, S ;
Puglia, AM ;
Rizzi, A ;
Zanardini, E ;
Sorlini, C ;
Corselli, C ;
Daffonchio, D .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 70 (10) :6147-6156