Implicit co-activation of American Sign Language in deaf readers: An ERP study

被引:54
作者
Meade, Gabriela [1 ,2 ]
Midgley, Katherine J. [3 ]
Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova [4 ]
Holcomb, Phillip J. [3 ]
Emmorey, Karen [4 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Joint Doctoral Program Language & Commun Disorder, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] San Diego State Univ, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[4] San Diego State Univ, Sch Speech Language & Hearing Sci, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Implicit phonological priming; Bimodal bilingualism; American Sign Language; N400; CROSS-LANGUAGE; UNCONSCIOUS TRANSLATION; WORD RECOGNITION; 2ND-LANGUAGE; ACTIVATION; PROFICIENT; INTERFERENCE; FORM;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandl.2017.03.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
In an implicit phonological priming paradigm, deaf bimodal bilinguals made semantic relatedness decisions for pairs of English words. Half of the semantically unrelated pairs had phonologically related translations in American Sign Language (ASL). As in previous studies with unimodal bilinguals, targets in pairs with phonologically related translations elicited smaller negativities than targets in pairs with phonologically unrelated translations within the N400 window. This suggests that the same lexicosemantic mechanism underlies implicit co-activation of a non-target language, irrespective of language modality. In contrast to unimodal bilingual studies that find no behavioral effects, we observed phonological interference, indicating that bimodal bilinguals may not suppress the non-target language as robustly. Further, there was a subset of bilinguals who were aware of the ASL manipulation (determined by debrief), and they exhibited an effect of ASL phonology in a later time window (700-900 ms). Overall, these results indicate modality-independent language co-activation that persists longer for bimodal bilinguals. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 61
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, 34 ANN M PSYCH SOC W
  • [2] The English Lexicon Project
    Balota, David A.
    Yap, Melvin J.
    Cortese, Michael J.
    Hutchison, Keith A.
    Kessler, Brett
    Loftis, Bjorn
    Neely, James H.
    Nelson, Douglas L.
    Simpson, Greg B.
    Treiman, Rebecca
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (03) : 445 - 459
  • [3] Lexical access in Catalan Signed Language (LSC) production
    Baus, Cristina
    Gutierrez-Sigut, Eva
    Quer, Josep
    Carreiras, Manuel
    [J]. COGNITION, 2008, 108 (03) : 856 - 865
  • [4] The role of syllables in sign language production
    Baus, Cristina
    Gutierrez, Eva
    Carreiras, Manuel
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [5] Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition
    BijeljacBabic, R
    Biardeau, A
    Grainger, J
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1997, 25 (04) : 447 - 457
  • [6] The importance of linguistic typology for the neurobiology of language
    Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina
    Schlesewsky, Matthias
    [J]. LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY, 2016, 20 (03) : 615 - 621
  • [7] Cross-linguistic differences in the neural representation of human language: evidence from users of signed languages
    Corina, David P.
    Lawyer, Laurel A.
    Cates, Deborah
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 3
  • [8] Investigating the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition: Electrophysiological Evidence for the Influences of Phonological Similarity
    Desroches, Amy S.
    Newman, Randy Lynn
    Joanisse, Marc F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 21 (10) : 1893 - 1906
  • [9] Dye M. W. G. ., 2006, LABORATORY PHONOLOGY, P241, DOI DOI 10.1515/9783110197211.1.241
  • [10] Emmorey K., 2016, 23 ANN M COGN NEUR S