Variations in response control within at-risk gamblers and non-gambling controls explained by GABAergic inhibition in the motor cortex

被引:20
作者
Chowdhury, Nahian S. [1 ]
Livesey, Evan J. [1 ]
Blaszczynski, Alex [1 ]
Harris, Justin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Intracortical inhibition; Inhibitory control; Impulsivity; Gambling; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; INTERVAL INTRACORTICAL INHIBITION; OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; SCREENING-TEST; STOP-SIGNAL; FACILITATION; ALCOHOL; TMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is used to study inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms in the motor cortex through the measurement of short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), indicative of GABAergic activity, and intracortical facilitation (ICF), indicative of glutamatergic activity. In the present study, TMS was delivered to the left motor cortex of 40 participants while we measured SICI and ICF at rest. We were interested in whether variation between individuals in these modulatory mechanisms is related to inhibitory control over responding measured as stop signal reaction time (SSRT). Within the same group of participants, we investigated whether SICI, ICF, SSRT, and self-reported impulsivity, are impaired in participants identified as At-Risk gamblers (n = 20) compared to non-gambling controls (n = 20). We found a significant negative correlation between SICI strength and SSRT, but no correlation between ICF strength and SSRT after controlling for the correlation between SICI and SSRT. Thus, poor inhibitory control of responding was associated with weak GABAergic activity. When taking into account the effects of substance/alcohol use and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptom severity, At-Risk gamblers showed elevated self-reported impulsivity, but did not differ from controls on SSRT or SICl/ICF. Our study is the first to show that individual differences in motor cortex inhibition can predict stopping performance, and the first to investigate paired-pulse TMS parameters (together with other impulse control measures) in a gambling population. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 163
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, CANADIAN PROBLEM GAM
  • [2] The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control
    Aron, Adam R.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENTIST, 2007, 13 (03) : 214 - 228
  • [3] Reliability and Validity of Three Instruments (DSM-IV, CPGI, and PPGM) in the Assessment of Problem Gambling in South Korea
    Back, Ki-Joon
    Williams, Robert J.
    Lee, Choong-Ki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, 2015, 31 (03) : 775 - 786
  • [4] The development of selective inhibitory control across the life span
    Bedard, AC
    Nichols, S
    Barbosa, JA
    Schachar, R
    Logan, GD
    Tannock, R
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 21 (01) : 93 - 111
  • [5] A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling
    Blaszczynski, A
    Nower, L
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2002, 97 (05) : 487 - 499
  • [6] Boroojerdi B, 2000, MUSCLE NERVE, V23, P1594, DOI 10.1002/1097-4598(200010)23:10<1594::AID-MUS19>3.3.CO
  • [7] 2-V
  • [8] The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C) - An effective brief screening test for problem drinking
    Bush, K
    Kivlahan, DR
    McDonell, MB
    Fihn, SD
    Bradley, KA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (16) : 1789 - 1795
  • [9] Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex
    Chen, R
    Tam, A
    Bütefisch, C
    Corwell, B
    Ziemann, U
    Rothwell, JC
    Cohen, LG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 80 (06) : 2870 - 2881
  • [10] Pathological Gambling and Motor Impulsivity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Chowdhury, Nahian S.
    Livesey, Evan J.
    Blaszczynski, Alex
    Harris, Justin A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, 2017, 33 (04) : 1213 - 1239