Cone-beam computed tomography versus computed tomography-guided ultrathin bronchoscopic diagnosis for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A propensity score-matched analysis

Background and objective CBCT-guided TBB using a UTB under VBN is a useful method for the diagnosis of peripheral small pulmonary lesions. CBCT-guided TBB using UTB under VBN has been used as an alternative to CT-guided TBB. However, the advantage of CBCT-guided TBB using UTB under VBN over CT-guided TBB is still unknown. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic yield of CT-guided TBB and CBCT-guided TBB using a propensity score-matched analysis. Methods Patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions <= 30 mm were included. Lesions whose bronchus could not be determined by CT were excluded. A UTB and biopsy forceps were advanced to the target bronchus under VBN, 2D-fluoroscopy and CT or CBCT. The CT-guided and CBCT-guided groups were matched for their propensity scores based on patient characteristics. Results We retrospectively reviewed 93 patients in the CT-guided group and 79 patients in the CBCT-guided group for this study. Furthermore, 48 distinct examination pairs were generated by propensity score matching. In the overall diagnostic yield, the CBCT-guided group showed better results (72.9%) than did the CT-guided group (47.9%) (P = 0.012). The median examination time lasted for 43 (IQR: 37-51) min in the CBCT-guided group and 50 (IQR: 43-62) min in the CT-guided group. The examination time in the CBCT-guided group was significantly shorter than that of the CT-guided group (P = 0.001). Conclusion CBCT-guided TBB had a better diagnostic yield and shorter examination time than did CT-guided TBB.