Gelatin-embedded cell-polymer constructs for histological cryosectioning

被引:21
作者
Brown, DA
Chou, YF
Beygui, RE
Dunn, JCY
Wu, BM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Henry L Samueli Sch Engn, Dept Bioengn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Pediat Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Henry L Samueli Sch Engn, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
tissue engineering; scaffold; histology; cryosectioning; gelatin;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.30116
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Many tissue-engineering strategies involve the delivery of cells via porous polymer scaffolds. Obtaining histological sections of the emerging tissue is often necessary to analyze numerous characteristics of the microscopic environment. However, difficulties arise upon applying standard histological techniques to cell-seeded polymer scaffolds. This report describes a simple and reliable method for cryosectioning cell-polymer constructs embedded in gelatin. Solvent-soluble (PLGA) and insoluble (PGA) scaffolds were cultured in vitro with preosteoblasts, followed by histological processing with paraffin, OCT, or gelatin. Although paraffin-embedded PGA scaffolds withstood standard sectioning and rinsing steps, paraffin-embedded PLGA scaffolds were partially dissolved during the clearing step. OCT-embedded scaffolds produced sections that did not adhere well to slides, and most of the sample was lost during rinsing steps. In contrast, gelatin-embedded scaffolds exhibited adequate structural integrity during cryosectioning, adhered well to the slides, retained the actual polymer morphology, and exhibited compatibility with common stains. (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 85
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] GELATIN EMBEDDING AND DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND IN THE EXAMINATION OF THE FETAL AND NEONATAL BRAIN
    KNOWLES, S
    PARKER, S
    WECKERT, RC
    FURNESS, ME
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1989, 9 (01) : 73 - 75
  • [22] Loebsack AB, 1999, J BIOMED MATER RES, V48, P504, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:4<504::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO
  • [23] 2-Y
  • [24] Histological methods to determine blood flow distribution with fluorescent microspheres
    Luchtel, DL
    Boykin, JC
    Bernard, SL
    Glenny, RW
    [J]. BIOTECHNIC & HISTOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 73 (06) : 291 - 309
  • [25] A novel flat-embedding method to prepare ultrathin cryosections from cultured cells in their in situ orientation
    Oorschot, V
    de Wit, H
    Annaert, WG
    Klumperman, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 50 (08) : 1067 - 1080
  • [26] Effects of cell concentration and growth period on articular and ear chondrocyte transplants for tissue engineering
    Panossian, A
    Ashiku, S
    Kirchhoff, CH
    Randolph, MA
    Yaremchuk, MJ
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (02) : 392 - 402
  • [27] Tissue engineering of functional cardiac muscle: molecular, structural, and electrophysiological studies
    Papadaki, M
    Bursac, N
    Langer, R
    Merok, J
    Vunjak-Novakovic, G
    Freed, LE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 280 (01): : H168 - H178
  • [28] TISSUE-ENGINEERED GROWTH OF CARTILAGE - THE EFFECT OF VARYING THE CONCENTRATION OF CHONDROCYTES SEEDED ONTO SYNTHETIC-POLYMER MATRICES
    PUELACHER, WC
    KIM, SW
    VACANTI, JP
    SCHLOO, B
    MOONEY, D
    VACANTI, CA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 23 (01) : 49 - 53
  • [29] Transplantation of human endothelial cell monolayer on artificial vascular prosthesis: The effect of growth-support surface chemistry, cell seeding density, ECM protein coating, and growth factors.
    Sipehia, R
    Martucci, G
    Lipscombe, J
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL CELLS BLOOD SUBSTITUTES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1996, 24 (01): : 51 - 63
  • [30] MR MICROSCOPY OF CHICK-EMBRYO VASCULATURE
    SMITH, BR
    EFFMANN, EL
    JOHNSON, GA
    [J]. JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1992, 2 (02): : 237 - 240