An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in India: Bridging IPAT and EKC hypotheses

被引:113
作者
Danish [1 ]
Ozcan, Burcu [2 ]
Ulucak, Recep [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Econ & Trade, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Firat Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, TR-23200 Elazig, Turkey
[3] Erciyes Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, Kayseri, Turkey
关键词
Nuclear energy; Carbon emissions; IPAT; EKC; Dynamic ARDL; India; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PANEL; POLLUTION; INCOME; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.net.2020.12.008
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The transition toward clean energy is an issue of great importance with growing debate in climate change mitigation. The complex nature of nuclear energy-CO2 emissions nexus makes it difficult to predict whether or not nuclear acts as a clean energy source. Hence, we examined the relationship between nuclear energy consumption and CO2 emissions in the context of the IPAT and Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) framework. Dynamic Auto-regressive Distributive Lag (DARDL), a newly modified econometric tool, is employed for estimation of long- and short-run dynamics by using yearly data spanning from 1971 to 2018. The empirical findings of the study revealed an instantaneous increase in nuclear energy reduces environmental pollution, which highlights that more nuclear energy power in the Indian energy system would be beneficial for climate change mitigation. The results further demonstrate that the overarching effect of population density in the IPAT equation stimulates carbon emissions. Finally, nuclear energy and population density contribute to form the EKC curve. To achieving a cleaner environment, results point out governmental policies toward the transition of nuclear energy that favours environmental sustainability. (C) 2020 Korean Nuclear Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:2056 / 2065
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Nuclear power for sustainable development: Current status and future prospects [J].
Adamantiades, A. ;
Kessides, I. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) :5149-5166
[2]  
Agency I. E., 2019, Nuclear Power in a Clean Energy System
[3]   The challenges of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution through energy sources: evidence from a panel of developed countries [J].
Akhmat, Ghulam ;
Zaman, Khalid ;
Shukui, Tan ;
Sajjad, Faiza ;
Khan, Muhammad Azhar ;
Khan, Muhammad Zahir .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2014, 21 (12) :7425-7435
[4]   Investigating the impact of nuclear energy consumption on GDP growth and CO2 emission: A panel data analysis [J].
Al-Mulali, Usama .
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2014, 73 :172-178
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Journal of Time Series Analysis
[7]   On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. ;
Menyah, Kojo ;
Wolde-Rufael, Yemane .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (11) :2255-2260
[8]   Do nuclear and renewable energy improve the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States [J].
Baek, Jungho .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 66 :352-356
[9]   A panel cointegration analysis of CO2 emissions, nuclear energy and income in major nuclear generating countries [J].
Baek, Jungho .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 145 :133-138
[10]   On the income-nuclear energy-CO2 emissions nexus revisited [J].
Baek, Jungho ;
Pride, Dominique .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 43 :6-10