Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses

被引:53
作者
Ugur, Murat [1 ]
Suri, Rakesh M. [1 ]
Daly, Richard C. [1 ]
Dearani, Joseph A. [1 ]
Park, Soon J. [1 ]
Joyce, Lyle D. [1 ]
Burkhart, Harold M. [1 ]
Greason, Kevin L. [1 ]
Schaff, Hartzell V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH; MITROFLOW PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; NORTH-AMERICAN; REPLACEMENT; MULTICENTER; EXPERIENCE; PERIMOUNT; OUTCOMES; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.051
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The study objective was to determine whether the new-generation Trifecta (St Jude Medical Inc, St Paul, Minn) bovine aortic valve bioprosthesis, which is designed for supra-annular positioning, produces early postoperative hemodynamic results comparable to or better than those of the Mitroflow (Sorin Group, Milan, Italy) or Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, Calif) bovine aortic valve bioprostheses. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a Trifecta, Mitroflow, or Perimount Magna bovine pericardial prosthesis at Mayo Clinic between June 2007 and December 2012 and analyzed early postoperative hemodynamic performance by Doppler echocardiography. Results: A total of 1436 patients underwent aortic valve replacement (Trifecta in 196, Mitroflow in 1135, Perimount Magna in 105). Preoperative characteristics and early clinical outcomes were similar among the 3 valve groups. The average mean gradients were lower and valve areas were greater with the Trifecta valves. For the Trifecta, Mitroflow, and Perimount Magna valves, the average mean gradient was 11.4 mmHg, 16.9 mmHg, and 14.1 mm Hg, respectively; the effective orifice area was 2.22 cm(2), 1.85 cm(2), and 2.09 cm(2), respectively; and the indexed effective orifice area was 1.14 cm(2)/m(2), 0.96 cm(2)/m(2), and 1.07 cm(2)/m(2), respectively (all P < .001). Similar statistical significance was found when data were stratified by valve size. Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (indexed effective orifice area <0.60 cm(2)/m(2)) was detected in 1.3% of patients (n = 2/150) with the Trifecta, 5.8% of patients (n = 44/758) with the Mitroflow, and 3.2% of patients (n = 3/95) with the Perimount Magna (P = .048). Conclusions: Early hemodynamic postoperative performance of the Trifecta bioprosthesis is favorable. Additional follow-up should determine whether these small hemodynamic differences will persist and influence later clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1940 / 1946
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Mitroflow Aortic Bioprosthesis 5-Year Follow-Up: North American Prospective Multicenter Study [J].
Asch, Federico M. ;
Heimansohn, David ;
Doyle, Daniel ;
Dembitsky, Walter ;
Ferdinand, Francis D. ;
Swanson, Jeffrey ;
Dearani, Joseph A. ;
Weissman, Neil J. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 94 (04) :1198-1203
[2]   The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: Results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study [J].
Bavaria, Joseph E. ;
Desai, Nimesh D. ;
Cheung, Anson ;
Petracek, Michael R. ;
Groh, Mark A. ;
Borger, Michael A. ;
Schaff, Hartzell V. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 147 (02) :590-597
[3]   Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method? [J].
Bleiziffer, Sabine ;
Eichinger, Walter B. ;
Hettich, Ina ;
Guenzinger, Ralf ;
Ruzicka, Daniel ;
Bauernschmitt, Robert ;
Lange, Ruediger .
HEART, 2007, 93 (05) :615-620
[4]  
Bonow Robert O, 2008, Circulation, V118, pe523, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190748
[5]   Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: A matched hemodynamic comparison [J].
Borger, Michael A. ;
Nette, A. Franka ;
Maganti, Manjula ;
Feindel, Christopher M. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2007, 83 (06) :2054-2059
[6]   Hemodynamic comparison of Bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus [J].
Botzenhardt, F ;
Eichinger, WB ;
Bleiziffer, S ;
Guenzinger, R ;
Wagner, IM ;
Bauernschmitt, R ;
Lange, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (12) :2054-2060
[7]   Bovine pericardial versus porcine stented replacement aortic valves: Early results of a randomized comparison of the Perimount and the Mosaic valves [J].
Chambers, John B. ;
Rajani, Ronak ;
Parkin, Denise ;
Rimington, Helen M. ;
Blauth, Christopher I. ;
Venn, Graham E. ;
Young, Christopher P. ;
Roxburgh, James C. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 136 (05) :1142-1148
[8]   A North American, Prospective, Multicenter Assessment of the Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Prosthesis [J].
Conte, John ;
Weissman, Neil ;
Dearani, Joseph A. ;
Bavaria, Joseph ;
Heimansohn, David ;
Dembitsky, Walter ;
Doyle, Daniel .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 90 (01) :144-U182
[9]   Valve Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch (VP-PM) A Long-Term Perspective [J].
Daneshvar, Samuel A. ;
Rahimtoola, Shahbudin H. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (13) :1123-1135
[10]   Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after implantation of the Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis: an initial single-centre experience [J].
Dell'Aquila, Angelo M. ;
Schlarb, Dominik ;
Schneider, Stefan R. B. ;
Sindermann, Juergen R. ;
Hoffmeier, Andreas ;
Kaleschke, Gerrit ;
Martens, Sven ;
Rukosujew, Andreas .
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 16 (02) :112-115