A General Framework for Multi-Criteria Based Feasibility Studies for Solar Energy Projects: Application to a Real-World Solar Farm

被引:7
作者
Bandaru, Sree Harsha [1 ]
Becerra, Victor [1 ]
Khanna, Sourav [1 ]
Espargilliere, Harold [1 ]
Torres Sevilla, Law [2 ]
Radulovic, Jovana [2 ]
Hutchinson, David [3 ]
Khusainov, Rinat [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Energy & Elect Engn, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, Hants, England
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Mech & Design Engn, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, Hants, England
[3] Univ Portsmouth, Fac Technol, Portsmouth PO1 3AH, Hants, England
[4] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Comp, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, Hants, England
关键词
solar energy; photovoltaics; multi criteria decision analysis; feasibility; solar farm;
D O I
10.3390/en14082204
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The growth of solar energy is projected to slow down during 2023-25 despite the fall in costs due to economic deceleration, reduced incentives, and market barriers including the lack of relevant and flexible energy project planning and decision-making tools. This study proposes a flexible and computationally simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)-based model that takes technical, financial, environmental, social and legal aspects of all project options as input and outputs a feasibility score for each option, which enables ranking the options and identifying the best alternative. The proposed model is applied to a real-world photovoltaic solar farm planned at a site in England and comprising nine different configurations formed by varying system capacity, energy storage option, mode of stakeholder, and network connections. The results of our study show that in this case the options without battery storage and a greater number of off-taker connections are more favorable than the options with battery storage. The analysis also shows that for the solar farm of the presented case study, 'self-consumption fraction' and 'energy yield', 'net present value', 'life-cycle carbon emission reduction', 'ease of permit acquisition' and 'public approval' are key sub-criteria for 'technical', 'financial', 'environmental', and 'social and legal' criteria, respectively. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the confidence on the obtained solution, and a change in the first preference was noticed when 'environmental' and 'social and legal' aspects are given higher weight over 'technical' and 'financial' aspects. The results obtained are in line with the recommendations by experts, who carried out an independent feasibility analysis considering the same options.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Sustainability assessment of a hybrid energy system [J].
Afgan, Nain H. ;
Carvalho, Maria G. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (08) :2903-2910
[2]   Sustainability assessment of hydrogen energy systems [J].
Afgan, NH ;
Carvalho, MG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2004, 29 (13) :1327-1342
[3]   Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants [J].
Afgan, NH ;
Carvalho, MG .
ENERGY, 2002, 27 (08) :739-755
[4]   Energetic-Environmental-Economic Feasibility and Impact Assessment of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System in Wastewater Treatment Plant: Case Study [J].
Andrei, Horia ;
Badea, Cristian Andrei ;
Andrei, Paul ;
Spertino, Filippo .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (01)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, RENEWABLE ENERGY
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Renewables
[7]   An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects [J].
Aragones-Beltran, P. ;
Chaparro-Gonzalez, F. ;
Pastor-Ferrando, J. P. ;
Rodriguez-Pozo, F. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (01) :249-264
[8]   Decision support system for ranking photovoltaic technologies [J].
Azzopardi, Brian ;
Martinez-Cesena, Eduardo A. ;
Mutale, Joseph .
IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2013, 7 (06) :669-679
[9]  
Ballal R., 2015, Energy and Power, Volume, V5, P1, DOI [DOI 10.5923/C.EP.201501.01, 10.5923/c.ep.201501.01]
[10]   Renewable Energy with Volatile Prices: Why NPV Fails to Tell the Whole Story [J].
Barcelona, Ricardo G. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CORPORATE FINANCE, 2015, 27 (01) :101-109