Who Is Likely to Benefit From Phase II Cardiac Rehabilitation?

被引:11
作者
Araya-Ramirez, Felipe [1 ]
Briggs, Kathe K. [2 ]
Bishop, Samantha R. [2 ]
Miller, Caroline E. [2 ]
Moncada-Jimenez, Jose [3 ]
Grandjean, Peter W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] E Alabama Med Ctr, Opelika, AL USA
[3] Univ Costa Rica, Sch Phys Educ & Sports, San Jose, Costa Rica
关键词
cardiac rehabilitation outcomes; physical and mental improvement; program adherence; CORONARY RISK-FACTORS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BEHAVIORAL-CHARACTERISTICS; EXERCISE CAPACITY; BODY-COMPOSITION; WALK TEST; IMPROVEMENTS; PREVENTION; PROGRAMS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181d0c17f
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To ascertain which patients are most likely to benefit from a phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 425 patients who completed a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), body weight (BW), and the Medical Outcomes Short Form Health Survey physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores before and after CR. These variables were compared between patients who attended 24 or less and 25 or more sessions and between tertiles on the basis of initial 6MWT and the relative change in 6MWT. RESULTS: The entire cohort of patients improved their 6MWT 20.1 +/- 16.3% with CR (P < .001). On average, patients experienced a modest reduction in BW (P = .03) and had higher PCS and MCS scores (P < .001 for both) after CR. The improvement in 6MWT was inversely related to initial walk distance (r = -0.465, P < .001). Patients in the lowest initial 6MWT tertile exhibited greater improvement in the 6MWT than those in the highest tertile (28 +/- 20 vs 13 +/- 10%, P < .001). Patients who attended 25 or more sessions demonstrated greater 6MWT (20 +/- 18 vs 18 +/- 14%, P = .012) and reductions in BW (-1.3 +/- 2.8 vs -0.5 +/- 2.5 kg, P = .003) than those attending 24 or fewer sessions. Patients exhibiting greater than 23% improvement in 6MWT lost more BW (-1.4 +/- 2.9 vs -0.6 +/- 2.5 kg, P = .006) and exhibited greater PCS (10.2 +/- 9.8 vs 6.3 +/- 9.4, P = .004) than those exhibiting < 12% improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients benefit physically and mentally from CR. Patients with lower initial functional ability and who attend 25 or more sessions enjoy the greatest improvements in walking ability and perception of physical health and function.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Ades Philip A., 2003, Cardiology Clinics, V21, P435, DOI 10.1016/S0733-8651(03)00056-0
[2]  
*AM ASS CARD PULM, 2003, GUID CARD REH SEC PR
[3]   Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update - A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation [J].
Balady, Gary J. ;
Williams, Mark A. ;
Ades, Philip A. ;
Bittner, Vera ;
Comoss, Patricia ;
Foody, JoAnne M. ;
Franklin, Barry ;
Sanderson, Bonnie ;
Southard, Douglas .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (20) :2675-2682
[4]   PSYCHOPHYSICAL BASES OF PERCEIVED EXERTION [J].
BORG, GAV .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1982, 14 (05) :377-381
[5]   Comparison of standard- and extended- length participation in cardiac rehabilitation on body composition, functional capacity, and blood lipids [J].
Brubaker, PH ;
Warner, JG ;
Rejeski, WJ ;
Edwards, DG ;
Matrazzo, BA ;
Ribisl, PM ;
Miller, HS ;
Herrington, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 78 (07) :769-773
[6]  
Enright Paul L, 2003, Respir Care, V48, P783
[7]   The 6-min walk test (6MW) as an efficacy endpoint in pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials: Demonstration of a ceiling effect [J].
Frost, AE ;
Langleben, D ;
Oudiz, R ;
Hill, N ;
Horn, E ;
McLaughlin, V ;
Robbins, IM ;
Shapiro, S ;
Tapson, VF ;
Zwicke, D ;
DeMarco, T ;
Schilz, R ;
Rubenfire, M ;
Barst, RJ .
VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 43 (01) :36-39
[8]  
Gibbons W J, 2001, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, V21, P87, DOI 10.1097/00008483-200103000-00005
[9]  
Gupta R, 2007, J CARDIOPULM REHABIL, V27, P11
[10]  
Hamilton D M, 2000, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, V20, P156, DOI 10.1097/00008483-200005000-00003