Achalasia-an unnecessary long way to diagnosis

被引:24
|
作者
Niebisch, S. [1 ]
Hadzijusufovic, E. [2 ]
Mehdorn, M. [1 ]
Mueller, M. [3 ]
Scheuermann, U. [1 ]
Lyros, O. [1 ]
Schulz, H. G. [4 ]
Jansen-Winkeln, B. [1 ]
Lang, H. [2 ]
Gockel, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Med Ctr, Dept Visceral Transplant Thorac & Vasc Surg, Liebigstr 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Med Ctr, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplant Surg, Mainz, Germany
[3] DKD German Diagnost Clin, Helios Clin, Dept Gastroenterorl, Wiesbaden, Germany
[4] EvK Protestant Hosp Castrop Rauxel, Dept Surg, Castrop Rauxel, Germany
来源
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS | 2017年 / 30卷 / 05期
关键词
achalasia; esophageal high-resolution manometry; time to diagnosis; HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY; IDIOPATHIC ACHALASIA; PNEUMATIC DILATION; CLINICAL-FEATURES; UNITED-STATES; CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; ESOPHAGUS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1093/dote/dow004
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Although achalasia presents with typical symptoms such as dysphagia, regurgitation, weight loss, and atypical chest pain, the time until first diagnosis often takes years and is frustrating for patients and nevertheless associated with high costs for the healthcare system. A total of 563 patients were interviewed with confirmed diagnosis of achalasia regarding their symptoms leading to diagnosis along with past clinical examinations and treatments. Included were patients who had undergone their medical investigations in Germany. Overall, 527 study subjects were included (male 46%, female 54%, mean age at time of interview 51 +/- 14.8 years). Dysphagia was present in 86.7%, regurgitation in 82.9%, atypical chest pain in 79%, and weight loss in 58% of patients before diagnosis. On average, it took 25 months (Interquartile Range (IQR) 9-65) until confirmation of correct diagnosis of achalasia. Though, diagnosis was confirmed significantly quicker (35 months IQR 9-89 vs. 20 months IQR 8-53; p< 0.01) in the past 15 years. The majority (72.1%) was transferred to three or more specialists. Almost each patient underwent at least one esophagogastroduodenoscopy (94.2%) and one radiological assessment (89.3%). However, esophageal manometry was performed in 70.4% of patients only. The severity of symptoms was independent with regard to duration until first diagnosis (Eckardt score 7.14 +/- 2.64 within 12 months vs. 7.29 +/- 2.61 longer than 12 months; P = 0.544). Fifty-five percent of the patients primarily underwent endoscopic dilatation and 37% a surgical myotomy. Endoscopic dilatation was realized significantly faster compared to esophageal myotomy (1 month IQR 0-4 vs. 3 months IQR 1-11; p< 0.001). Although diagnosis of achalasia was significantly faster in the past 15 years, it still takes almost 2 years until the correct diagnosis of achalasia is confirmed. Alarming is the fact that although esophageal manometry is known as the gold standard to differentiate primary motility disorders, only three out of four patients had undergone this diagnostic pathway during their diagnostic work-up. Better education of medical professionals and broader utilization of highly sensitive diagnostic tools, such as high-resolution manometry, are strictly necessary in order to correctly diagnose affected patients and to offer therapy faster.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modern Achalasia: Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment
    Pesce, Marcella
    Pagliaro, Marta
    Sarnelli, Giovanni
    Sweis, Rami
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2023, 29 (04) : 419 - 427
  • [22] Is esophageal manometry essential for the diagnosis of achalasia? Identifying patients with achalasia by the esophageal clearance method
    Masato Hoshino
    Nobuo Omura
    Fumiaki Yano
    Kazuto Tsuboi
    Se Ryung Yamamoto
    Shunsuke Akimoto
    Takahiro Masuda
    Yuki Sakashita
    Naoko Fukushima
    Hideyuki Kashiwagi
    Esophagus, 2021, 18 : 163 - 168
  • [23] New trends and concepts in diagnosis and treatment of achalasia
    Allaix, Marco E.
    Patti, Marco G.
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2013, 91 (06): : 352 - 357
  • [24] ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia
    Vaezi, Michael F.
    Pandolfino, John E.
    Vela, Marcelo F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 (08) : 1238 - 1249
  • [25] Erroneous Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Achalasia
    Kessing, Boudewijn F.
    Bredenoord, Albert J.
    Smout, Andre J. P. M.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 9 (12) : 1020 - 1024
  • [26] Long-Term Efficacy of Pneumatic Dilation and Esophageal Stenting for the Treatment of Achalasia
    Qian, Lijuan
    Wang, Bin
    Li, Kebei
    Yu, Lianzhen
    Ding, Jing
    Zhang, Hongjie
    Ding, Xiafen
    Shi, Ruihua
    DIGESTION, 2013, 88 (04) : 209 - 216
  • [27] Long-term outcomes of treatments for achalasia
    Nullens, Sara
    Fockens, Paul
    Bredenoord, Albert J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 37 (04) : 408 - 413
  • [28] Rapid drinking challenge during high-resolution manometry is complementary to timed barium esophagogram for diagnosis and follow-up of achalasia
    Ponds, F. A.
    Oors, J. M.
    Smout, A. J. P. M.
    Bredenoord, A. J.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2018, 30 (11)
  • [29] Achalasia: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology,treatment and outcomes
    Orla M O'Neill
    Brian T Johnston
    Helen G Coleman
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (35) : 5806 - 5812
  • [30] Endoscopic pressure study integrated system for the diagnosis of achalasia
    Nishikawa, Yohei
    Inoue, Haruhiro
    Shimamura, Yuto
    Navarro, Marc Julius
    Kawamata, Natsuki
    Azuma, Daisuke
    Ushikubo, Kei
    Kimoto, Yoshiaki
    Yamamoto, Kazuki
    Fujiyoshi, Yusuke
    Okada, Hiroki
    Tanaka, Ippei
    Toshimori, Akiko
    Tanabe, Mayo
    Onimaru, Manabu
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 36 (05) : 565 - 572