Numerical modeling of self-pressurization and pressure control by a thermodynamic vent system in a cryogenic tank

被引:34
作者
Majumdar, Alok [1 ]
Valenzuela, Juan [1 ]
LeClair, Andre [1 ]
Moder, Jeff [2 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Marshall Space Flight Ctr, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA
[2] NASA, Glenn Res Ctr, 21000 Brookpark Rd, Cleveland, OH 44135 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Cryogenic fluid management; Numerical model;
D O I
10.1016/j.cryogenics.2015.12.001
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a numerical model of a system-level test bed the multipurpose hydrogen test bed (MHTB) using the Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program (GFSSP). MHTB is representative in size and shape of a space transportation vehicle liquid hydrogen propellant tank, and ground-based testing was performed at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) to generate data for cryogenic storage. GFSSP is a finite volume-based network flow analysis software developed at MSFC and used for thermofluid analysis of propulsion systems. GFSSP has been used to model the self-pressurization and ullage pressure control by the Thermodynamic Vent System (TVS). A TVS typically includes a Joule-Thompson (J-T) expansion device, a two-phase heat exchanger (HEX), and a mixing pump and liquid injector to extract thermal energy from the tank without significant loss of liquid propellant. For the MHTB tank, the HEX and liquid injector are combined into a vertical spray bar assembly. Two GFSSP models (Self Pressurization and TVS) were separately developed and tested and then integrated to simulate the entire system. The Self-Pressurization model consists of multiple ullage nodes, a propellant node, and solid nodes; it computes the heat transfer through multilayer insulation blankets and calculates heat and mass transfer between the ullage and liquid propellant and the ullage and tank wall. A TVS model calculates the flow through a J-T valve, HEX, and spray and vent systems. Two models are integrated by exchanging data through User Subroutines of both models. Results of the integrated models have been compared with MHTB test data at a 50% fill level. Satisfactory comparison was observed between tests and numerical predictions. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Bolshinskiy L, 2013, ESSAFY1301202
[2]  
Hastings LJ, 2004, NASATM2004213175 MAR
[3]  
Hastings LJ, 2003, NASATM2003212926 MAR
[4]  
Majumdar A.K., 2013, NASATM2013217492 NASATM2013217492
[5]  
Martin JJ, 2001, NASATM2001211089 MAR
[6]  
Rohsenow WM, 1998, HDB HEAT TRANSFER