The prognostic factors of primary colorectal sarcoma and the clinical outcomes of negative lymph node dissection

被引:2
|
作者
Wei, Zhewen [1 ]
Mao, Rui [1 ]
Zhang, Yefan [1 ]
Bi, Xinyu [1 ]
Zhou, Jianguo [1 ]
Li, Zhiyu [1 ]
Huang, Zhen [1 ]
Chen, Xiao [1 ]
Zhao, Jianjun [1 ]
Zhao, Hong [1 ]
Cai, Jianqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Natl Canc Ctr,Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, 17 Nanli, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Colorectal sarcoma; prognostic factors; cancer-specific survival (CSS); negative lymph node (NLN) dissection;
D O I
10.21037/atm-20-4286
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Primary colorectal sarcoma is an extremely rare malignancy that is associated with poor patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of primary colorectal sarcoma and evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with these prognostic factors. Methods: Between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2016, the clinical data of 315 patients with primary colorectal sarcoma were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and by log-rank test. The prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis and hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of covariates were also estimated. The optimal cutoff value for NLN count at dissection was identified using X-tile software and validated by univariate Cox regression analysis. Results: Of the 315 patients with primary colorectal sarcoma identified, 88.6% received surgery. The median follow-up time was 34 months with an interquartile range (IQR) of 9-79 months. The 5-year rate of CSS was 76.73% and 27.8% for the surgery group and the non-surgery group, respectively (P<0.0001). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis performed on the data of nonmetastatic patients demonstrated that sex, race, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy had no effect on patient CSS, with age, tumor site, tumor grade, and NLN dissection being independent prognostic factors. A significant correlation was found between advanced age (>80 years old) and poor CSS (HR 1.964; 95% CI: 1.005-3.839; P=0.048). There were also significant correlations between colonic tumors and poor CSS (HR 2.903; 95% CI: 1.348-6.250; P=0.006) and grade IV tumors and poor CSS (HR 3.431; 95% CI: 1.725-6.823; P<0.001), while NLN dissection was associated with improved CSS (HR 0.946; 95% CI: 0.911-0.983; P=0.004). X-tile software analysis was used to determine that the optimal cutoff value for NLN count was 13. Patients who received NLN dissection with a cutoff value of 13 or more displayed better CSS than those who did not (P=0.016). Conclusions: Primary colorectal sarcoma patients can benefit significantly from primary tumor surgery. Age, tumor site, grade and NLN dissection are independent prognostic factors for CSS in nonmetastatic patients. Importantly, nonmetastatic patients treated with NLN dissection with an NLN count of 13 or more have significantly better CSS.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in synovial sarcoma of the extremities
    Wisanuyotin, Taweechok
    Radapat, Krisana
    Sirichativapee, Winai
    Paholpak, Permsak
    Kosuwon, Weerachai
    Sumnanoont, Chat
    Jeeravipoolvarn, Polasak
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 9 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [2] Clinical features and outcomes in patients with Ewing sarcoma and regional lymph node involvement
    Applebaum, Mark A.
    Goldsby, Robert
    Neuhaus, John
    DuBois, Steven G.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2012, 59 (04) : 617 - 620
  • [3] Prognostic factors in completely resected lymph-node-negative pulmonary adenocarcinoma
    Pakvisal, Nussara
    Chantranuwat, Poonchavist
    Vinayanuwattikun, Chanida
    Sitthideatphaiboon, Piyada
    Teerapakpinyo, Chinachote
    Shuangshoti, Shanop
    Benjacholamas, Vichai
    Pornpattanarak, Nopporn
    Sriuranpong, Virote
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (07) : 2238 - +
  • [4] Prognostic factors in patients who received paraaortic lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis
    Hikage, Makoto
    Fujiya, Keiichi
    Kamiya, Satoshi
    Tanizawa, Yutaka
    Bando, Etsuro
    Notsu, Akifumi
    Terashima, Masanori
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (03) : 1027 - 1037
  • [5] Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival Outcomes in Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Wu, Zijian
    Wang, Zhijie
    Zheng, Zhaoxu
    Bi, Jianjun
    Wang, Xishan
    Feng, Qiang
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 7151 - 7164
  • [6] Prognostic factors in patients who received paraaortic lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis
    Makoto Hikage
    Keiichi Fujiya
    Satoshi Kamiya
    Yutaka Tanizawa
    Etsuro Bando
    Akifumi Notsu
    Masanori Terashima
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2022, 407 : 1027 - 1037
  • [7] Prognostic importance of isolated peritumoral lymphangiosis carcinomatosa in lymph-node-negative colorectal carcinoma
    Meyer, W
    Awad-Allah, A
    Steinhäuser, BB
    Jurowich, C
    Kaiser, A
    Gebhardt, C
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 386 (02) : 124 - 131
  • [8] Prognostic factors of overall survival in patients with delayed lymph node dissection for cutaneous malignant melanoma
    Kretschmer, L
    Preusser, KP
    Marsch, WC
    Neumann, C
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (05) : 483 - 489
  • [9] Elective lymph node dissection in primary malignant melanoma
    Petres, J
    Rompel, R
    Buttner, P
    Teichelmann, K
    Garbe, C
    HAUTARZT, 1996, 47 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [10] Sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by lymph node dissection for localised primary cutaneous melanoma
    Kyrgidis, Athanassios
    Tzellos, Thrasivoulos
    Mocellin, Simone
    Apalla, Zoe
    Lallas, Aimilios
    Pilati, Pierluigi
    Stratigos, Alexander
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (05):