Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education

被引:330
作者
Lockyer, Jocelyn [1 ]
Carraccio, Carol [2 ]
Chan, Ming-Ka [3 ]
Hart, Danielle [4 ,5 ]
Smee, Sydney [6 ]
Touchie, Claire [6 ,7 ]
Holmboe, Eric S. [8 ]
Frank, Jason R. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Amer Board Pediat Inc, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ Manitoba, Rady Fac Hlth Sci, Max Rady Coll Med, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[4] Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[6] Med Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Accreditat Council Grad Med Educ, Chicago, IL USA
[9] Royal Coll Phys & Surg Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[10] Univ Ottawa, Dept Emergency Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
WORKPLACE-BASED ASSESSMENT; SELF-ASSESSMENT; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PEDIATRICS MILESTONES; CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE; FEEDBACK; DEFICIENCIES; EXPERTISE; LEARNERS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315082
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The meaningful assessment of competence is critical for the implementation of effective competency-based medical education (CBME). Timely ongoing assessments are needed along with comprehensive periodic reviews to ensure that trainees continue to progress. New approaches are needed to optimize the use of multiple assessors and assessments; to synthesize the data collected from multiple assessors and multiple types of assessments; to develop faculty competence in assessment; and to ensure that relationships between the givers and receivers of feedback are appropriate. This paper describes the core principles of assessment for learning and assessment of learning. It addresses several ways to ensure the effectiveness of assessment programs, including using the right combination of assessment methods and conducting careful assessor selection and training. It provides a reconceptualization of the role of psychometrics and articulates the importance of a group process in determining trainees' progress. In addition, it notes that, to reach its potential as a driver in trainee development, quality care, and patient safety, CBME requires effective information management and documentation as well as ongoing consideration of ways to improve the assessment system.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 616
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, J DEWEY ED SELECTED
[2]   State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback [J].
Archer, Julian C. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (01) :101-108
[3]  
Ben David MF, 2001, MED TEACH, V23, P535
[4]   Expertise in performance assessment: assessors' perspectives [J].
Berendonk, Christoph ;
Stalmeijer, Renee E. ;
Schuwirth, Lambert W. T. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 18 (04) :559-571
[5]   Shifting paradigms: From Flexner to competencies [J].
Carraccio, C ;
Wolfsthal, SD ;
Englander, R ;
Ferentz, K ;
Martin, C .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (05) :361-367
[6]  
Courts B., 2012, Journal of College Teaching Learning, V9, P121
[7]   A new framework for designing programmes of assessment [J].
Dijkstra, J. ;
Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. ;
Schuwirth, L. W. T. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2010, 15 (03) :379-393
[8]  
Eva K, 2013, REPORT MED COUNCIL C
[9]   I'll never play professional football and other fallacies of self-assessment [J].
Eva, Kevin W. ;
Regehr, Glenn .
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2008, 28 (01) :14-19
[10]   Knowing when to look it up: A new conception of self-assessment ability [J].
Eva, Kevin W. ;
Regehr, Glenn .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (10) :S81-S84