Production efficiency in sunflower: The role of water and nitrogen stress

被引:42
作者
Joel, G [1 ]
Gamon, JA [1 ]
Field, CB [1 ]
机构
[1] STANFORD UNIV, DEPT BIOL SCI, STANFORD, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00093-X
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We monitored the impact of water stress, nitrogen stress, and the combination of both on the fractional interception of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) and growth per unit of intercepted radiation in sunflower canopies over a growing season. The efficiency with which intercepted radiation was converted into biomass (epsilon) was reduced by approximately 35% in the nitrogen-limited canopy and approximately 30% in the water-limited canopy. The relative effect of the stress treatments on epsilon was sensitive to assumptions concerning solar geometry. The impact of stress on fPAR depended more on whether the canopy was nitrogen- and/or water-limited. In the second half of the season, nitrogen stress reduced fPAR by approximately 25%, whereas water stress reduced fPAR by about 70%. Reduction in leaf area index, 45% and 85% for the nitrogen-stressed and water-stressed canopies, respectively, appeared to be a major factor in the fPAR reductions. In the water-stressed canopy, wilting also contributed to the reduced fPAR. Neither of the stress treatments affected the strong correlation between fPAR and simple ratio (SR) or the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). We used three approaches to calculate fPAR, with two based on a single sun position and one based on the sun position updated at hourly intervals. In general, epsilon was notably higher in the calculations with higher solar elevation angles. (C)Elsevier Science Inc., 1997.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 188
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   ESTIMATING ABSORBED PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AND LEAF-AREA INDEX FROM SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE IN WHEAT [J].
ASRAR, G ;
FUCHS, M ;
KANEMASU, ET ;
HATFIELD, JL .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (02) :300-306
[2]   RESOURCE LIMITATION IN PLANTS - AN ECONOMIC ANALOGY [J].
BLOOM, AJ ;
CHAPIN, FS ;
MOONEY, HA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1985, 16 :363-392
[3]  
Campbell G.S., 1986, INTRO ENV BIOPHYSICS
[4]  
CHAPIN FS, 1990, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V21, P423, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002231
[5]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN VEGETATION INDEXES, RADIATION ABSORPTION, AND NET PHOTOSYNTHESIS EVALUATED BY A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS [J].
CHOUDHURY, BJ .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1987, 22 (02) :209-233
[6]   RESPONSE OF SUNFLOWER TO STRATEGIES OF IRRIGATION .1. GROWTH, YIELD AND THE EFFICIENCY OF WATER-USE [J].
CONNOR, DJ ;
JONES, TR ;
PALTA, JA .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1985, 10 (01) :15-36
[7]  
DAUGHTRY CST, 1983, AGRON J, V75, P527, DOI 10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500030026x
[8]   SPECTRAL ESTIMATES OF ABSORBED RADIATION AND PHYTOMASS PRODUCTION IN CORN AND SOYBEAN CANOPIES [J].
DAUGHTRY, CST ;
GALLO, KP ;
GOWARD, SN ;
PRINCE, SD ;
KUSTAS, WP .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 39 (02) :141-152
[9]   A NOTE OF CAUTION CONCERNING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CUMULATED INTERCEPTED SOLAR-RADIATION AND CROP GROWTH [J].
DEMETRIADESSHAH, TH ;
FUCHS, M ;
KANEMASU, ET ;
FLITCROFT, I .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1992, 58 (3-4) :193-207
[10]  
DEVRIES FWT, 1974, J THEOR BIOL, V45, P339, DOI DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(74)90119-2