IV Versus Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Critically Ill Infants and Children: Comparison of Dosing, Anticoagulation Quality, Efficacy, and Safety Outcomes

被引:14
|
作者
Diab, Yaser A. [1 ]
Ramakrishnan, Karthik [1 ]
Ferrell, Brandon [1 ]
Chounoune, Reginald [1 ]
Alfares, Fahad A. [1 ]
Endicott, Kendal M. [1 ]
Rooney, Sara [1 ]
Corcoran, Jason [1 ]
Zurakowski, David [1 ]
Berger, John T. [1 ]
Shankar, Venkat [1 ]
Nath, Dilip S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Natl Hlth Syst, Washington, DC 20010 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
antifactor Xa; enoxaparin; low molecular weight heparins; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; ANTI-XA CONCENTRATIONS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; INTRAVENOUS ENOXAPARIN; RISK-FACTORS; THERAPY; EXPERIENCE; THROMBOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/PCC.0000000000001126
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Subcutaneous enoxaparin is the mainstay anticoagulant in critically ill pediatric patients although it poses several challenges in this patient population. Enoxaparin infused IV over 30 minutes represents an attractive alternative, but there is limited experience with this route of administration in children. In this study, we assess dosing, anticoagulation quality, safety, and clinical efficacy of IV enoxaparin compared to subcutaneous enoxaparin in critically ill infants and children. Design: Retrospective single-center study comparing dosing, anticoagulation quality, safety, and clinical efficacy of two different routes of enoxaparin administration (IV vs subcutaneous) in critically ill infants and children. Key outcome measures included dose needed to achieve target antifactor Xa levels, time required to achieve target antifactor Xa levels, proportion of patients achieving target anticoagulation levels on initial dosing, number of dose adjustments, duration spent in the target antifactor Xa range, anticoagulation-related bleeding complications, anticoagulation failure, and radiologic response to anticoagulation. Setting: Tertiary care pediatric hospital. Patients: All children admitted to the cardiac ICU, PICU, or neonatal ICU who were prescribed enoxaparin between January 2014 and March 2016 were studied. Interventions: One hundred ten patients were identified who had received IV or subcutaneous enoxaparin and had at least one postadministration peak antifactor Xa level documented. Measurements and Main Results: Of the 139 courses of enoxaparin administered, 96 were therapeutic dose courses (40 IV and 56 subcutaneous) and 43 were prophylactic dose courses (20 IV and 23 subcutaneous). Dosing, anticoagulation quality measurements, safety, and clinical efficacy were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Our study suggests that anticoagulation with IV enoxaparin infused over 30 minutes is a safe and an equally effective alternative to subcutaneous enoxaparin in critically ill infants and children.
引用
收藏
页码:E207 / E214
页数:8
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Safety and efficacy of different prophylactic anticoagulation dosing regimens in critically and non-critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ortega-Paz, Luis
    Galli, Mattia
    Capodanno, Davide
    Franchi, Francesco
    Rollini, Fabiana
    Bikdeli, Behnood
    Mehran, Roxana
    Montalescot, Gilles
    Gibson, C. Michael
    Lopes, Renato D.
    Andreotti, Felicita
    Angiolillo, Dominick J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2022, 8 (07) : 677 - 686
  • [2] Comparison of Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin as Outpatient Anticoagulation Bridging Therapy in Patients With a Mechanical Heart Valve Versus Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
    Bui, Hien Thuy
    Krisnaswami, Ashok
    Le, Chieu-Uyen
    Chan, James
    Shenoy, Bach-Nga
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (10) : 1429 - 1433
  • [3] A Quality Improvement Study: Comparison of Volume-Based and Rate-Based Tube Feeding Efficacy and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients
    Swiatlo, Travis
    Berta, Janine W.
    Mauldin, Kasuen
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 35 (03) : 578 - 583