A comparison of the nonlinear response of the ear to air and to bone-conducted sound

被引:7
|
作者
Clavier, O. H. [1 ]
Norris, J. A. [1 ]
Dietz, A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Creare Res & Dev Inc, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; INPUT/OUTPUT FUNCTIONS; HEARING PROTECTION; CANCELLATION; CALIBRATION; ATTENUATION; LOUDNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2010.03.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The nonlinear response of the ear to air-conducted sound has been studied to some depth. However, the nonlinear response of the ear to bone-conducted sound has received less attention. A comparison of the nonlinear response of humans to air and bone-conducted sound is presented. Two different human subject test techniques were combined in this investigation. The first was a psychoacoustic investigation measuring the perceived cancellation of a bone-conducted sound stimulus with another air-conducted sound stimulus. The measurement was accomplished through a loudness-matching technique. The second investigation used distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) to make objective measurements of the response of the ear to both air-conducted sound and bone-conducted sound. The results were compared to determine whether the measured compression effects were similar for the different types of stimuli. Results show that both the measured psychoacoustic response and the measured objective response of the ear to air-conducted sound and to bone-conducted sound were similar at 2 and 4 kHz. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 232
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulation studies for comparison of bone-conducted ultrasound and bone-conducted audible sound
    Luo, Yishan
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Weiqi
    2007 IEEE/ICME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX MEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 1546 - 1549
  • [2] Measurements of bone-conducted sound in the chinchilla external ear
    Bowers, Peter
    Ravicz, Michael E.
    Rosowski, John J.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2024, 441
  • [3] Cancellation of the electrical cochlear response with air- and bone-conducted sound
    Lowy, K
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1942, 14 (02): : 156 - 158
  • [4] BONE-CONDUCTED SOUND
    HUXLEY, A
    NATURE, 1990, 343 (6253) : 28 - 28
  • [5] PHASE AND INTENSITY RELATIONSHIPS IN THE INTERFERENCE OF BONE-CONDUCTED AND AIR-CONDUCTED SOUND
    DOLCH, JP
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1954, 26 (05): : 942 - 942
  • [6] Comparison of brain magnetic fields evoked by air-conducted sounds, bone-conducted audible sounds, and bone-conducted ultrasounds
    Nakagawa, S
    Nigoro, T
    Yamaguchi, M
    Tonoike, M
    Hosoi, H
    Watanabe, Y
    Imaizumi, S
    NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (06) : S915 - S915
  • [7] MIDDLE-EAR MUSCLE EFFECTS ON COCHLEAR RESPONSES TO BONE-CONDUCTED SOUND
    IRVINE, DRF
    WESTER, KG
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1973, : 47 - 47
  • [8] MIDDLE-EAR MUSCLE EFFECTS ON COCHLEAR RESPONSES TO BONE-CONDUCTED SOUND
    IRVINE, DRF
    WESTER, KG
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1974, 91 (04): : 482 - 496
  • [9] Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Response to Air-Conducted Sound and Bone-Conducted Vibration in Vestibular Schwannoma
    Kinoshita, Makoto
    Iwasaki, Shinichi
    Fujimoto, Chisato
    Inoue, Aki
    Egami, Naoya
    Chihara, Yasuhiro
    Ushio, Munetaka
    Yamasoba, Tatsuya
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (07) : 1342 - 1348
  • [10] Air- and Bone-Conducted Sources of Feedback With an Active Middle Ear Implant
    Hartl, Renee M. Banakis
    Easter, James R.
    Alhussaini, Mohamed A.
    Tollin, Daniel J.
    Jenkins, Herman A.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2019, 40 (03): : 725 - 731