Early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention improved 30-day clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with profound cardiogenic shock

被引:290
作者
Sheu, Jiunn-Jye [1 ]
Tsai, Tzu-Hsien [2 ]
Lee, Fan-Yen [1 ]
Fang, Hsiu-Yu [2 ]
Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
Leu, Steve [2 ]
Yang, Cheng-Hsu [2 ]
Chen, Shyh-Ming [2 ]
Hang, Chi-Ling [2 ]
Hsieh, Yuan-Kai [2 ]
Chen, Chien-Jen [2 ]
Wu, Chiung-Jen
Yip, Hon-Kan
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung Med Ctr, Chang Gung Mem Hosp,Div Cardiovasc Surg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung Med Ctr, Chang Gung Mem Hosp,Dept Surg,Div Cardiol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; profound cardiogenic shock; extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; EARLY REVASCULARIZATION; PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY; LIFE-SUPPORT; SHORT-TERM; MORTALITY; REPERFUSION; PREDICTORS; TRIAL; COUNTERPULSATION;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e8acf7
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study tested the hypothesis that early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator offered additional benefits in improving 30-day outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with profound cardiogenic shock undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: Between May 1993 and July 2002, 920 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Of these patients, 12.5% (115) with cardiogenic shock were enrolled in this study (group 1). Between August 2002 and December 2009, 1650 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Of these patients, 13.3% (219) complicated with cardiogenic shock were enrolled (group 2). Results: The incidence of profound shock (defined as systolic blood pressure remaining <= 75 mm Hg after intra-aortic balloon pump and inotropic agent supports) was similar in both groups (21.7% vs. 21.0%, p > .5). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support, which was available only for patients in group 2, was performed in the catheterization room. The results demonstrated that final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow in infarct-related artery was similar between the two groups (p = .678). However, total 30-day mortality and the mortality of patients with profound shock were lower in group 2 than in group 1 (all p < .04). Additionally, the hospital survival time was remarkably longer in patients in group 2 than in patients in group 1 (p = .0005). Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that unsuccessful reperfusion, presence of advanced congestive heart failure, profound shock, and age were independent predictors of 30-day mortality (all p < .02). Conclusion: Early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention improved 30-day outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with complicated with profound cardiogenic shock. (Crit Care Med 2010; 38:1810-1817)
引用
收藏
页码:1810 / 1817
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Antman Elliott M., 2004, J Am Coll Cardiol, V44, pE1, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.014
[2]  
ATONIUCCI D, 1998, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V31, P294
[3]   The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: Data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 [J].
Barron, HV ;
Every, NR ;
Parsons, LS ;
Angeja, B ;
Goldberg, RJ ;
Gore, JM ;
Chou, TM .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 141 (06) :933-939
[4]  
Berger PB, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P122
[5]   Analysis of the outcome for patients experiencing myocardial infarction and cardiopulmonary resuscitation refractory to conventional therapies necessitating extracorporeal life support rescue [J].
Chen, JS ;
Ko, WJ ;
Yu, HY ;
Lai, LP ;
Huang, SC ;
Chi, NH ;
Tsai, CH ;
Wang, SS ;
Lin, FY ;
Chen, YS .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (04) :950-957
[6]   Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis [J].
Chen, Yih-Sharng ;
Lin, Jou-Wei ;
Yu, Hsi-Yu ;
Ko, Wen-Je ;
Jerng, Jih-Shuin ;
Chang, Wei-Tien ;
Chen, Wen-Jone ;
Huang, Shu-Chien ;
Chi, Nai-Hsin ;
Wang, Chih-Hsien ;
Chen, Li-Chin ;
Tsai, Pi-Ru ;
Wang, Sheoi-Shen ;
Hwang, Juey-Jen ;
Lin, Fang-Yue .
LANCET, 2008, 372 (9638) :554-561
[7]   Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials [J].
Cheng, Jin M. ;
den Uil, Corstiaan A. ;
Hoeks, Sanne E. ;
van der Ent, Martin ;
Jewbali, Lucia S. D. ;
van Domburg, Ron T. ;
Serruys, Patrick W. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (17) :2102-2108
[8]   Five-year results of 219 consecutive patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postoperative cardiogenic shock [J].
Doll, N ;
Kiaii, B ;
Borger, M ;
Bucerius, J ;
Krämer, K ;
Schmitt, DV ;
Walther, T ;
Mohr, FW .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 77 (01) :151-157
[9]   Percutaneous assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock: evidence under construction vs. expert opinion: reply [J].
Engstrom, Annemarie E. ;
Sjauw, Krischan D. ;
Henriques, Jose P. S. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (04) :502-502
[10]   CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY FROM A COMMUNITY-WIDE PERSPECTIVE, 1975 TO 1988 [J].
GOLDBERG, RJ ;
GORE, JM ;
ALPERT, JS ;
OSGANIAN, V ;
DEGROOT, J ;
BADE, J ;
CHEN, Z ;
FRID, D ;
DALEN, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (16) :1117-1122