Systematic review of effective retention incentives for health workers in rural and remote areas: Towards evidence-based policy

被引:261
作者
Buykx, Penny [1 ]
Humphreys, John [1 ]
Wakerman, John [3 ]
Pashen, Dennis [2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Sch Rural Hlth, Bendigo, Vic 3552, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, Mt Isa Ctr Rural & Remote Hlth, Mt Isa, Qld, Australia
[3] Ctr Remote Hlth, Alice Springs, NT, Australia
关键词
health policy; recruitment and retention; rural and remote service; workforce; LOAN REPAYMENT; PROGRAMS; RECRUITMENT; PHYSICIANS; AUSTRALIA; OUTCOMES; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1584.2010.01139.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Poor retention of health workers is a significant problem in rural and remote areas, with negative consequences for both health services and patient care. Objective: This review aimed to synthesise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of retention strategies for health workers in rural and remote areas, with a focus on those studies relevant to Australia. Design: A systematic review method was adopted. Six program evaluation articles, eight review articles and one grey literature report were identified that met study inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: While a wide range of retention strategies have been introduced in various settings to reduce unnecessary staff turnover and increase length of stay, few have been rigorously evaluated. Little evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of any specific strategy is currently available, with the possible exception of health worker obligation. Multiple factors influence length of employment, indicating that a flexible, multifaceted response to improving workforce retention is required. Conclusions: This paper proposes a comprehensive rural and remote health workforce retention framework to address factors known to contribute to avoidable turnover. The six components of the framework relate to staffing, infrastructure, remuneration, workplace organisation, professional environment, and social, family and community support. In order to ensure their effectiveness, retention strategies should be rigorously evaluated using appropriate pre- and post-intervention comparisons.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 109
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Alexander C, 1998, Aust J Rural Health, V6, P136, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1584.1998.tb00299.x
[2]   Developing a competitive advantage: Considerations from Australia for the recruitment and retention of rural and remote primary health workers [J].
Allan, Julaine ;
Ball, Patrick .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2008, 14 (01) :106-112
[3]  
*AUSTR MED ASS, 2007, STAT TERR RUR WORKF
[4]  
*AUSTR NAT AUD OFF, 2009, 26 AUSTR NAT AUD OFF
[5]  
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2008, REP AUD HLTH WORKF R
[6]  
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2005, GEN PRACT AUSTR 2004
[7]   Financial incentives for return of service in underserved areas: a systematic review [J].
Baernighausen, Till ;
Bloom, David E. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 9
[8]  
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2008, SYSTEMATIC REV CRDS
[9]  
Crouse Byron J, 2006, WMJ, V105, P16
[10]   Community and self: Concepts for rural physician integration and retention [J].
Cutchin, MP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (11) :1661-1674