Patients' experiences and perspectives of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

被引:61
作者
Carfora, Liam [1 ]
Foley, Ciara M. [1 ]
Hagi-Diakou, Phillip [1 ]
Lesty, Phillip J. [1 ]
Sandstrom, Marianne L. [1 ]
Ramsey, Imogen [2 ]
Kumar, Saravana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, UniSA Allied Hlth & Human Performance, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ South Australia, Rosemary Bryant AO Res Ctr, UniSA Clin & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 04期
关键词
OF-LIFE ASSESSMENTS; ONCOLOGY; IMPACT; PROFESSIONALS; FACILITATORS; IMPROVEMENT; SCORES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0267030
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used by clinicians in everyday clinical practice to assess patients' perceptions of their own health and the healthcare they receive. By providing insight into how illness and interventions impact on patients' lives, they can help to bridge the gap between clinicians' expectations and what matters most to the patient. Given increasing focus on patient-centred care, the objective of this meta-synthesis was to summarise the qualitative evidence regarding patients' perspectives and experiences of the use of PROMs in clinical care. MethodsA systematic search of the following databases was undertaken in August 2020: Medline, EMBASE, EMCARE, PsychINFO, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. This review was conducted and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research (CASP). A meta-ethnographic approach was used for data extraction and meta-synthesis of findings (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020202506). ResultsFourteen studies from a range of countries with differing qualitative research methodologies were identified. Three themes were identified, namely 'patient preferences regarding PROMs', 'patient perceived benefits' and 'barriers to patient engagement with PROMs'. The perspectives of patients suggested they preferred PROMs that were simple and relevant to their conditions and found benefits in the way they facilitated self-reflection and effective communication with their clinicians. Patients, however, questioned the relevance of some individual questions and purpose. ConclusionPROMs can be a useful tool in the clinical setting by enabling individualisation and patient centred care. This meta-synthesis provides insights into what patients find beneficial as well as barriers to their engagement, highlighting the importance of educating patients about PROMs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
a D Administration F., 2009, Federal Register, V74, P65132
[2]   Patient and clinician opinions of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of patients with rare diseases: a qualitative study [J].
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee ;
Isa, Fatima ;
Kyte, Derek ;
Pankhurst, Tanya ;
Kerecuk, Larissa ;
Ferguson, James ;
Lipkin, Graham ;
Calvert, Melanie .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2020, 18 (01)
[3]   Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Management of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study [J].
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee ;
Kyte, Derek ;
Cockwell, Paul ;
Marshall, Tom ;
Dutton, Mary ;
Walmsley-Allen, Natalie ;
Slade, Anita ;
McMullan, Christel ;
Calvert, Melanie .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 74 (02) :167-178
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies
[5]   Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers [J].
Antunes, Barbara ;
Harding, Richard ;
Higginson, Irene J. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (02) :158-175
[6]   Patient-reported outcomes in RA care improve patient communication, decision-making, satisfaction and confidence: qualitative results [J].
Bartlett, Susan J. ;
De Leon, Elaine ;
Orbai, Ana-Maria ;
Haque, Uzma J. ;
Manno, Rebecca L. ;
Ruffing, Victoria ;
Butanis, Alessandra ;
Duncan, Trisha ;
Jones, Michelle R. ;
Leong, Amye ;
Perin, Jamie ;
Smith, Katherine Clegg ;
Bingham, Clifton O., III .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 59 (07) :1662-1670
[7]  
Basch Ethan, 2018, Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, V38, P122, DOI 10.1200/EDBK_200383
[8]   Patient-Reported Outcomes - Harnessing Patients' Voices to Improve Clinical Care [J].
Basch, Ethan .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (02) :105-108
[9]   Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Deal, Allison M. ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Hudis, Clifford A. ;
Sabbatini, Paul ;
Rogak, Lauren ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Atkinson, Thomas M. ;
Chou, Joanne F. ;
Dulko, Dorothy ;
Sit, Laura ;
Barz, Allison ;
Novotny, Paul ;
Fruscione, Michael ;
Sloan, Jeff A. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (06) :557-+
[10]   Adverse Symptom Event Reporting by Patients vs Clinicians: Relationships With Clinical Outcomes [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Jia, Xiaoyu ;
Heller, Glenn ;
Barz, Allison ;
Sit, Laura ;
Fruscione, Michael ;
Appawu, Mark ;
Iasonos, Alexia ;
Atkinson, Thomas ;
Goldfarb, Shari ;
Culkin, Ann ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (23) :1624-1632