Nasogastric tube feeding and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer

被引:51
|
作者
Nugent, B. [1 ]
Parker, M. J. [2 ]
McIntyre, I. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Belfast City Hosp, No Ireland Canc Ctr, Belfast Hlth & Social Care Trust, Belfast BT9 7AB, Ireland
[2] Royal Grp Hosp Trust, Educ & Res Ctr, No Ireland Clin Res Support Ctr, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Univ Ulster, Sch Hlth Sci, Newtownabbey, North Ireland
关键词
BMI; enteral feeding; head and neck cancer; FLUOROSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY; ENTERAL NUTRITION; WEIGHT-LOSS; RADIOTHERAPY; PLACEMENT; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY; MALNUTRITION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01047.x
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: For patients with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer, oral nutrition may not provide adequate nutrition during radical radiotherapy or chemoradiation treatment, resulting in enteral feeding initiation. Enteral feeding may be delivered via a nasogastric tube or by a gastrostomy tube. The present study aimed to determine how different treatment modalities impact on requirement for enteral feeding and which method of enteral feeding provided the most benefit to the patient, as demonstrated by weight loss and the number of unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions. Methods: Patients who were treated with radical radiotherapy or chemoradiation between January 2004 and June 2007 were reviewed retrospectively (n = 196, male = 149, female = 47). Data were collected on demographics, diagnosis, T and N classification, nutritional status, unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions, and type and duration of enteral feeding. Subjects were divided into three subgroups depending on the treatment received. Comparisons were then made between methods of enteral feeding. Results: Combined modality treatment (Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiation) results in a higher proportion of patients requiring enteral feeding (66-71% compared to 12% for radiotherapy). Patients fed via a prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy lost the least amount of weight during treatment (-4.6% to +1.4%), although the method of enteral feeding did not statistically influence weight difference at the end of treatment. The enteral feeding method did not influence unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions. Conclusions: Combined modality treatment results in a greater requirement for enteral feeding, with these patient groups having the greatest weight loss. The findings obtained in the present study indicate that the method of enteral feeding did not statistically influence weight loss at the end of treatment or unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 284
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of early prophylactic feeding on long term tube dependency outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer
    Brown, Teresa
    Banks, Merrilyn
    Hughes, Brett G. M.
    Lin, Charles
    Kenny, Lizbeth M.
    Bauer, Judith D.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 72 : 17 - 25
  • [42] Physician opinions on decision making for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube placement
    Fessler, Theresa A.
    Short, Timothy B.
    Willcutts, Kate F.
    Sawyer, Robert G.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (12): : 4089 - 4097
  • [43] Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrojejunostomy Tube Feeding in Children
    El-Matary, Wael
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 26 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [44] Long-Term Nasogastric Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Older Asians With Dysphagia: A Pragmatic Study
    Jaafar, Mohamad Hasif
    Mahadeva, Sanjiv
    Tan, Kit Mun
    Chin, Ai-Vyrn
    Kamaruzzaman, Shahrul B.
    Khor, Hui Min
    Saedon, Nor Izzati
    Tan, Maw Pin
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 34 (02) : 280 - 289
  • [45] The patient experience of having a feeding tube during treatment for head and neck cancer: A systematic literature review
    Hazzard, Emily
    Gulliver, Sarah
    Walton, Karen
    McMahon, Anne-Therese
    Milosavljevic, Marianna
    Tapsell, Linda
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2019, 33 : 66 - 85
  • [46] Buried bumper syndrome - a rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube feeding
    Borkowska, Anna
    Jankowska, Agnieszka
    Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz, Agnieszka
    Landowski, Piotr
    Kamniska, Barbara
    PRZEGLAD GASTROENTEROLOGICZNY, 2012, 7 (02): : 111 - 113
  • [47] Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Is a Negative Prognostic Factor for Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer
    Siano, Marco
    Jarisch, Nadine
    Joerger, Markus
    Espeli, Vittoria
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (06) : 3725 - 3729
  • [48] Effect of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube on swallowing in advanced head and neck cancer: A randomized controlled study
    Axelsson, Lars
    Silander, Ewa
    Nyman, Jan
    Bove, Mogens
    Johansson, Leif
    Hammerlid, Eva
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2017, 39 (05): : 908 - 915
  • [49] A feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial of oral feeding plus pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (TUBE trial): Study protocol
    Paleri V.
    Wood J.
    Patterson J.
    Stocken D.D.
    Cole M.
    Vale L.
    Franks J.
    Guerrero-Urbano T.
    Donnelly R.
    Barclay S.
    Rapley T.
    Rousseau N.
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 2 (1)
  • [50] Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube Placement Using a Balloon Catheter in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
    Fujita, Takeshi
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Kobayashi, Taiga
    Washida, Yasuo
    Kato, Masatoshi
    Iida, Etsushi
    Shimizu, Kensaku
    Matsunaga, Naofumi
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2013, 37 (01) : 117 - 122