Soil quality assessment of urban green space under long-term reclaimed water irrigation

被引:33
作者
Lyu, Sidan [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Weiping [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Ecoenvironm Sci Res Ctr, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
Water reuse; Landscape irrigation; Ecological risk; Soil quality index; Redundancy analysis; Urban green space; MINIMUM DATA SET; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS; ACCUMULATION; CULTIVATION; NITROGEN; INDEXES; LAND;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-015-5693-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Reclaimed water is widely used for landscape irrigation with the benefits of saving fresh water and ameliorating soil quality. Field samples were collected from seven parks in Beijing irrigated reclaimed water with different irrigation history in 2011 and 2014 to evaluate the long-term impacts of reclaimed water irrigation on soil quality. Soil quality index method was used to assess the comprehensive effects of reclaimed water irrigation on soil. Results showed that the effects of reclaimed water irrigation on the soil nutrient conditions were limited. Compared with tap water irrigation, soil salinity was significantly higher in 2011, while the difference was insignificant in 2014; soil heavy metals were slightly higher by 0.5-10.6 % in 2011 and 2014, while the differences were insignificant. Under reclaimed water irrigation, soil biological activities were significantly improved in both years. Total nitrogen in reclaimed water had a largest effect on soil quality irrigated reclaimed water. Soil quality irrigated with reclaimed water increased by 2.6 and 6.8 % respectively in 2011 and 2014, while the increases were insignificant. Soil quality of almost half samples was more than or closed to soil quality of natural forest in Beijing. Soil quality was ameliorated at some extent with long-term reclaimed water irrigation.
引用
收藏
页码:4639 / 4649
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Mitchell, JP .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 90 (01) :25-45
[2]  
Andrews SS, 2001, ECOL APPL, V11, P1573, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1573:DASQAT]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Cambardella, CA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2004, 68 (06) :1945-1962
[5]   On-farm assessment of soil quality in California's central valley [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Mitchell, JP ;
Mancinelli, R ;
Karlen, DL ;
Hartz, TK ;
Horwath, WR ;
Pettygrove, GS ;
Scow, KM ;
Munk, DS .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (01) :12-23
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, METHODS SOIL ANAL PA, DOI [10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34, DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.3.C34]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, METHODS DETERMINATIO
[8]  
[Anonymous], B SOIL WATER CONSERV
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BEIJ WAT RES B
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Indian J. Environ. Sci.