The evaluation of energy-environmental efficiency of China's industrial sector: based on Super-SBM model

被引:26
作者
Chen, Fang [1 ]
Zhao, Tao [1 ]
Wang, Juan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Inst Environm Sci CML, Leiden, Netherlands
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy-environmental efficiency; Dynamic change; Driving factors; Industrial sector; Malmquist index; Super-SBM model; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; DEA;
D O I
10.1007/s10098-019-01713-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the process of urbanization and industrialization, a growing attention has been paid to the energy-environmental efficiency in China's industrial sector. Such researches mainly focused on calculating the efficiency and exploring its driving factors at sectoral, provincial and regional perspectives. In this paper, we proposed to evaluate the energy-environmental efficiency of China' industrial sector and its driving factors at a dynamic change perspective. Combining super-slack-based measure (Super-SBM) model and Malmquist index, this paper calculated the energy-environmental efficiency of China's 30 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) from 2012 to 2016 and captured its dynamic change. Then we aggregated China's 30 provinces into three groups based on their relevant dynamic change values, namely high-growth, mid-growth and low-growth groups. Finally, we verified the impact of investment in pollution control on industrial energy-environmental efficiency in different groups. The results showed that: Beijing, Inner Mongolia, Guangdong, Hunan, Tianjin and Shaanxi performed efficiently during the whole study period. Most provinces have improved their energy-environmental efficiency from 2012 to 2016. The decomposition results indicated that the technology change was responsible for the growth of energy-environmental efficiency. Economic development level positively and significantly influenced the energy-environmental efficiency of the industrial sector as a whole and three groups, while pollution control investment had a significantly negative effect on energy-environmental efficiency of high-growth and low-growth groups. This study concluded that all the provinces should pay attention to technology progress and sustainable pollution control investment for improving the energy-environmental efficiency in the long term. Additionally, differentiated strategies to improve energy-environmental efficiency for different provinces and groups should be implemented. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1414
页数:18
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Amoco BP, 2017, BP STAT REV
[2]  
Fare R., 1994, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANA, P227
[3]   A Sustainable Industry-Environment Model for the Identification of Urban Environmental Risk to Confront Air Pollution in Beijing, China [J].
Gao, Guilin ;
Zeng, Xueting ;
An, Chunjiang ;
Yu, Lei .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)
[4]   Environmental capability: a Bradley-Terry model-based approach to examine the driving factors for sustainable coal-mining environment [J].
Hasanuzzaman ;
Bhar, Chandan ;
Srivastava, Varnita .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2018, 20 (05) :995-1016
[5]   Analysis on provincial industrial energy efficiency and its influencing factors in China based on DEA-RS-FANN [J].
He, Yong ;
Liao, Nuo ;
Zhou, Ya .
ENERGY, 2018, 142 :79-89
[6]   The driving forces of the change in China's energy intensity: An empirical research using DEA-Malmquist and spatial panel estimations [J].
Huang, Junbing ;
Du, Dan ;
Hao, Yu .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2017, 65 :41-50
[7]  
IPCC C.W. T., 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
[8]  
Jiang JH, 2004, RES QUANT EC TECHNOL, V21, P16
[9]   Energy efficiency analysis on Chinese industrial sectors: an improved Super-SBM model with undesirable outputs [J].
Li, Hong ;
Shi, Jin-feng .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 65 :97-107
[10]   Measuring green productivity growth of Chinese industrial sectors during 1998-2011 [J].
Li, Ke ;
Lin, Boqiang .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 36 :279-295