PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF POTENTIAL SALT TOLERANT TURFGRASS SPECIES TO SALINITY STRESS

被引:0
|
作者
Zulkaliph, Noor Azwa [1 ,2 ]
Juraimi, Abdul Shukor [1 ,2 ]
Uddin, Md Kamal [1 ,3 ]
Shamsuzzaman, S. M. [1 ,4 ]
Ismail, Mohd Razi [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, TPU, Turf Unit, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Putra Malaysia, Dept Crop Sci, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Univ Putra Malaysia, Dept Land Management, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[4] Soil Resource Dev Inst, Krishi Khamar Sarak, Dhaka 1215, Bangladesh
[5] Univ Putra Malaysia, Inst Trop Agr, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
来源
BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY | 2017年 / 46卷 / 01期
关键词
Turfgrass; Physiology; Morphology; Salt tolerance; Salinity stress; MECHANISMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In the present research, the growth responses and quality of turfgrass species were studied under salinity stress. Chlorophyll content, relative water content, proline accumulation, and mineral content analysis used in this study were highly related with one another, indicating their mutual effectiveness in predicting relative salinity tolerance. Relative water and chlorophyll content were found high in Paspalum vaginatum Sw., Zoysia matrella L., and Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. 'satiri', whereas, proline content was low. These three species were less affected by selectivity of saline ion (Na) uptake. Physiological parameters, indicating that P. vaginatum, Z. matrella and C. dactylon 'satiri' are more salt tolerant than C. dactylon 'tifdwarf'. The SEM micrograph showed salt gland excretion presence on Z. matrella, C. dactylon 'satiri' and C. dactylon 'tifdwarf'_leaves. Roots cortex cell collapsed on C. dactylon 'tifdwarf' was greater compared to other three species
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 364
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GROWTH RESPONSES OF SALT TOLERANT TURFGRASS TO SALINITY STRESS
    Zulkaliph, Noor Azwa
    Juraimi, Abdul Shukor
    Uddin, Md Kamal
    Ismail, Mohd Razi
    Shamsuzzaman, S. M.
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 46 (01): : 343 - 353
  • [2] Comparative morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits in sensitive and tolerant maize genotypes in response to salinity and pb stress
    Zamani, Elnaz
    Bakhtari, Bahlanes
    Razi, Hooman
    Hildebrand, David
    Moghadam, Ali
    Alemzadeh, Abbas
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [3] Evaluation of physiological and growing behavior of warm season turfgrass species against salinity stress
    Singh, Babita
    Sindhu, S. S.
    Arora, Ajay
    Yadav, Harendra
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2019, 89 (03): : 482 - 488
  • [4] Growth response of four turfgrass species to salinity
    Alshammary, SF
    Qian, YL
    Wallner, SJ
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2004, 66 (02) : 97 - 111
  • [5] Determining tolerant tomato genotypes to salt stress according to physiological and morphological manner
    Eynizadeh, Peyman
    Ravari, Seid Zabihallah
    Moradi, Mohammad
    Dehghani, Ali
    Dehghani, Hamid
    AOB PLANTS, 2023, 15 (06):
  • [6] Growth response of eight tropical turfgrass species to salinity
    Uddin, Md. Kamal
    Juraimi, Abdul Shukor
    Ismail, Mohd. Razi
    Othman, Radziah
    Rahim, Anuar Abdul
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 8 (21): : 5799 - 5806
  • [7] Morphological, physiological, and biochemical response of citrus rootstocks to salt stress
    Arikan, Seyma
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 59 (06): : 891 - 899
  • [8] Morphological and Physiological Evaluations of Grafted Tomato Plants in Response to Salinity Stress
    Saleem, Abdul Manan
    Handa, Avtar K.
    Kim, Hye-Ji
    HORTSCIENCE, 2016, 51 (09) : S317 - S317
  • [9] PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSE OF SALT-TOLERANT AND NONTOLERANT ALFALFA TO SALINITY DURING GERMINATION
    ALLEN, SG
    DOBRENZ, AK
    BARTELS, PG
    CROP SCIENCE, 1986, 26 (05) : 1004 - 1008
  • [10] Differential Response of Salt-Tolerant and Susceptible Barley Genotypes to Salinity Stress
    Tavakoli, F.
    Vazan, S.
    Moradi, F.
    Shiran, B.
    Sorkheh, K.
    JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2010, 24 (03) : 244 - 260