Histomorphometric Results in Ridge Preservation Procedures Comparing Various Graft Materials in Extraction Sockets With Nongrafted Sockets in Humans: A Systematic Review

被引:26
作者
Barallat, Lucia [1 ]
Ruiz-Magaz, Vanessa [1 ]
Levi, Paul A., Jr. [2 ]
Mareque-Bueno, Santiago [1 ]
Galindo-Moreno, Pablo [3 ]
Nart, Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Periodontol, Barcelona 08195, Spain
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodontol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Univ Granada, Dept Oral Surg & Implant Dent, Granada, Spain
关键词
ridge preservation procedures; histology; DRIED BONE ALLOGRAFT; BIO-OSS COLLAGEN; CALCIUM-SULFATE HEMIHYDRATE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; ALVEOLAR RIDGE; POLYGLYCOLIDE SPONGE; HISTOLOGIC ANALYSIS; IMPLANT PLACEMENT; AUGMENTATION; MEMBRANE;
D O I
10.1097/ID.0000000000000124
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction:The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate, from a histological point of view, the amount of newly formed bone in ridge preservation procedures using various graft materials in comparison with natural healing (NH) and to determine which is the ideal type of graft to be used.Materials and Methods:A search strategy was developed to find articles in a human model published between 1990 and January 2013 in English language using MEDLINE database.Results:Thirty-four articles were included in this systematic review. When comparing the percentage of newly formed bone using various grafting materials with NH, calcium sulfate, magnesium enriched hydroxyapatite, and porcine-derived bone grafts offered the best outcomes. However, due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, the search was extended to determine which type of graft resulted in greatest bone formation.Conclusion:When comparing ridge preservation with NH, only 3 studies encountered a greater amount of newly formed bone in the ridge preservation group, whereas the rest did not find statistically significant differences or even observed a greater percentage of newly formed bone in the control group. Therefore, more studies are needed to determine whether the use of graft materials enhances new bone formation in contrast to NH alone and to determine the most effective bone grafting material.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 554
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Aimetti M, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P901
[2]   Histological comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using enamel matrix derivatives versus Bio-Oss Collagen: a pilot study [J].
Alkan, E. A. ;
Parlar, A. ;
Yildirim, B. ;
Senguven, B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 42 (12) :1522-1528
[3]  
AMLER M H, 1960, J Am Dent Assoc, V61, P32
[4]  
Araújo M, 2008, INT J PERIODONT REST, V28, P123
[5]   Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction.: An experimental study in the dog [J].
Araújo, MG ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) :212-218
[6]   Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. part 1: Histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months [J].
Artzi, Z ;
Tal, H ;
Dayan, D .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 71 (06) :1015-1023
[7]  
Babbush Charles A, 2003, Implant Dent, V12, P325, DOI 10.1097/01.ID.0000095466.18042.31
[8]  
Barone A, 2008, J PERIODONTOL, V79, P1370, DOI [10.1902/jop.2008.070628, 10.1902/jop.2008.070628 ]
[9]   Histologic Analysis of Healing After Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized Human Bone Allograft [J].
Beck, Tina M. ;
Mealey, Brian L. .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 81 (12) :1765-1772
[10]   OSSEOUS REPAIR OF POSTEXTRACTION ALVEOLUS IN MAN [J].
BOYNE, PJ .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1966, 21 (06) :805-&