Bonding performance of melamine-urea-formaldehyde and phenol-resorcinol-formaldehyde adhesives in interior grade glulam

被引:20
作者
Zhou, Jun [1 ]
Yue, Kong [1 ]
Lu, Weidong [1 ]
Chen, Zhangjing [2 ]
Cheng, Xiucai [3 ]
Liu, Weiqing [1 ]
Jia, Chong [4 ]
Tang, Lijuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Virginia Tech Univ, Dept Sustainable Biomat, Blacksburg, VA USA
[3] Nanjing Inst Prod Qual Inspect, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Mat Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
MUF; carboxymethyl cellulose; wood moisture content; strength development; WOOD; CELLULOSE;
D O I
10.1080/01694243.2017.1313185
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Wood moisture content (MC) affects the glued laminated beam (glulam) bonding strength. Selected adhesives were Phenol-Resorcinol-Formaldehyde (PRF) and Melamine-Urea-Formaldehyde (MUF) adhesives with 1, 1.5 and 2% (w/w) carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) formic acid solutions. Douglas fir (pseudotsuga menziesii) from North America was used in the test. The bonding behavior of these adhesives with wood at 12 and 18% MC were investigated. The study focused on the effect of 18% MC on shear strength performance of MUF and PRF adhesives and optimizing the formula of CMC formic acid solution. Compressive shear strength of wood with MUF adhesive with 2% (w/w) formic acid solution at 12 and 18% MC stabilized at 10.6 and 10.0 MPa, respectively, which were 17 and 16% higher than that with PRF adhesive at the same condition. At 12-18% MC, MC had a little effect on bonding strength. However, 18% MC wood with PRF adhesive had 52.2% less initial strength increasing rate than that of 12% MC wood. 18% MC wood with MUF adhesives with 1, 1.5 and 2% (w/w) CMC formic acid solutions had 16.0, 15.5 and 27.0% less initial strength increasing rates than that of 12% MC wood, respectively. MUF adhesive using 2% CMC formic solution required the shortest press time at 12 and 18% MC about 1.6 and 2.7 h, respectively. The strength of PRF adhesive was significantly affected by wood MC and enough press time is essential for the proper bonding strength.
引用
收藏
页码:2630 / 2639
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Bao XG, 1991, ADHES CHINA, V12, P23
[2]  
Chen G, 2010, CHINA ADHES, V19, P1
[3]  
Deng F, 2015, J APPL POLYM SCI, V132, DOI [10.1002/APP.42666, 10.1002/app.42666]
[4]   Urea-formaldehyde (UF) adhesive resins for wood [J].
Dunky, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 1998, 18 (02) :95-107
[5]  
Frank S, 2013, INT J ADHES ADHES, V45, P32
[6]  
Frihart CR, 2005, J ASTM INT, V7, P1
[7]  
Hamid RM, 2009, EUR J WOOD WOOD PROD, V67, P207
[8]  
Ivana GG, 2008, GLASNIK SUMARSKOG FA, V98, P39
[9]  
Joao MMF, 2011, INT J ADHES ADHES, V31, P127
[10]   Curing behavior of melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF) resin adhesive [J].
Lei, Hong ;
Frazier, Charles E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2015, 62 :40-44