Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions from economic growth: A comparative study of China and the United States

被引:169
作者
Wang, Qiang [1 ]
Zhao, Mingming [1 ]
Li, Rongrong [1 ,2 ]
Su, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon dioxide CO2 emissions; Comparative decoupling analysis; LMDI; China; The United States; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL PRESSURE; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; AUSTRALIA; INDUSTRY; DRIVERS; SECTOR; CITY; COAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.285
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China and the United States (U.S) produce approximately one-third of global economic output, and emit more than two-fifths of global total carbon emissions. Comparing the decoupling of economic growth from carbon emissions in China and the U.S. can inform the development of effective mitigation strategies for those two countries and the world. In this study, we compared both the carbon emissions performance and the decoupling performance between China and the U.S. We quantified the decoupling status in China and U.S. using the Tapio decoupling indicator, and decomposed the decoupling index to explore the driving factors affecting the decoupling using the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) technique. The results show that China experienced expansive coupling and weak decoupling in most years between 2000 and 2014; the U.S. experienced mostly weak and strong decoupling. In general, income and population effects restricted decoupling, whereas the energy intensity and energy mix effects promoted the decoupling process in China and the U.S. In addition, the carbon intensity effect exerted negative and positive effects on decoupling in China and the U.S., respectively. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 184
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions: A decomposition analysis of Italian energy consumption [J].
Andreoni, V. ;
Galmarini, S. .
ENERGY, 2012, 44 (01) :682-691
[2]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, IPCC EN IND SU UNPUB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SUST DEV IND MEAS DE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Fifth assessment report (AR5). Synthesis Report
[7]   Re-estimating the decoupling effect: Is there an actual transition towards a less energy-intensive economy? [J].
Bithas, K. ;
Kalimeris, P. .
ENERGY, 2013, 51 :78-84
[8]  
BP, 2017, STAT REV WORLD EN
[9]   Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil [J].
de Freitas, Luciano Charlita ;
Kaneko, Shinji .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (08) :1459-1469
[10]   Cyclical fluctuation patterns and decoupling: Towards common EU-28 environmental performance [J].
Delgado Rodriguez, Ma Jesus ;
Cabezas Ares, Alfredo ;
de Lucas Santos, Sonia .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 175 :696-706