Margins in breast conserving surgery: A practice-changing process

被引:22
作者
Rubio, I. T. [1 ]
Ahmed, M. [2 ]
Kovacs, T. [3 ]
Marco, V. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Breast Surg Oncol, Hosp Univ Vall dHebron, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Kings Coll London, Res Oncol, Div Canc Studies, London SE1 9RT, England
[3] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Breast Surg, London SE1 9RT, England
[4] Hosp Quiron Barcelona, Dept Pathol, Barcelona, Spain
来源
EJSO | 2016年 / 42卷 / 05期
关键词
Margins; Breast conserving surgery; Breast cancer; CARCINOMA-IN-SITU; ONCOLOGY CONSENSUS GUIDELINE; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; LOCAL RECURRENCE; RE-EXCISION; AMERICAN SOCIETY; SURGICAL MARGINS; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; REOPERATION RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Margins in breast conserving surgery (BCS) have been a long standing subject debate: This largely arises from the absence of a consensus on what constitutes an adequate margin width, resulting in re-excision rates of 25-40% for close or positive margins and its consequent impact upon cosmesis, economic costs, patient dissatisfaction and lack of bearing on survival. Accepting that the increased risk of local recurrences (LR) has its influence on survival, the decrease in LR in BCS in the last decade have been motivated by better surgical techniques for assessing negative margins, use of targeted therapies and in general with the multimodal treatment in the management of breast cancer patients. Since the publication of the consensus guidelines on margins there has evolved a trend of changing attitudes towards re-excision. Surgeons are considering margins in the context of all factors including not only patient and tumor characteristics but also the regional and systemic treatment the patient is receiving. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 640
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]  
Ahmed M, BREAST CANC RES TREA
[3]   Surgical treatment of nonpalpable primary invasive and in situ breast cancer [J].
Ahmed, Muneer ;
Rubio, Isabel T. ;
Klaase, Joost M. ;
Douek, Michael .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 12 (11) :645-663
[4]   Systematic review of radioguided versus wire-guided localization in the treatment of non-palpable breast cancers [J].
Ahmed, Muneer ;
van Hemelrijck, Mieke ;
Douek, Michael .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 140 (02) :241-252
[5]   Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression [J].
Anders, Carey K. ;
Hsu, David S. ;
Broadwater, Gloria ;
Acharya, Chaitanya R. ;
Foekens, John A. ;
Zhang, Yi ;
Wang, Yixin ;
Marcom, P. Kelly ;
Marks, Jeffrey R. ;
Febbo, Phillip G. ;
Nevins, Joseph R. ;
Potti, Anil ;
Blackwell, Kimberly L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (20) :3324-3330
[6]  
Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center (AFHSC), 2013, MSMR, V20, P25
[7]   Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: Patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data [J].
Arriagada, R ;
Le, MG ;
Rochard, F ;
Contesso, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (05) :1558-1564
[8]   Age, Breast Cancer Subtype Approximation, and Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy [J].
Arvold, Nils D. ;
Taghian, Alphonse G. ;
Niemierko, Andrzej ;
Raad, Rita F. Abi ;
Sreedhara, Meera ;
Nguyen, Paul L. ;
Bellon, Jennifer R. ;
Wong, Julia S. ;
Smith, Barbara L. ;
Harris, Jay R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (29) :3885-3891
[9]   Predictive Factors for Residual Disease in Re-Excision Specimens After Breast-Conserving Surgery [J].
Atalay, Can ;
Irkkan, Cigdem .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (04) :339-344
[10]   What is an Adequate Margin for Breast-Conserving Surgery? Surgeon Attitudes and Correlates [J].
Azu, Michelle ;
Abrahamse, Paul ;
Katz, Steven J. ;
Jagsi, Reshma ;
Morrow, Monica .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) :558-563