Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review

被引:10
作者
Poveromo, Luke P. [1 ]
Franck, Philipp [1 ]
Ellison, Angela [1 ]
Janhofer, David E. [1 ]
Asadourian, Paul A. [1 ]
Otterburn, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Med Ctr, Div Plast Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
acellular dermal matrix; breast reconstruction; complication; implant-based reconstruction; Pre-pectoral; tissue expander; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; IMPLANT; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; PREDICT;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003188
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is frequently used during prepectoral tissue expander-based breast reconstruction. However, there has been a paucity of literature describing the experience of prepectoral reconstruction without the accompanying use of ADM. We seek to highlight our institutional experience with immediate prepectoral tissue expander placement without the use of ADM in breast reconstruction. Methods A retrospective, single-institution review of patient records was performed to identify all patients who underwent either skin sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate tissue expander placement without the use of ADM. Demographics including age, body mass index, comorbidities, history of smoking or steroid use, perioperative radiation or chemotherapy, intraoperative details, and complication profiles during the tissue expander stage were retrospectively collected and analyzed. At the time of tissue expander placement, all mastectomy flaps were evaluated clinically and with indocyanine green laser angiography. Postoperative outcomes were tracked. Results Between 2017 and 2020, 63 patients (for a total of 108 breasts) underwent either skin sparing (16%) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (84%) with immediate prepectoral tissue expander without ADM placement. Fourteen percent of breasts developed postoperative cellulitis, 19% of breasts developed skin compromise, and 5% required a postoperative revisional procedure that did not result in immediate expander explant. There was a 13% (n = 14 breasts) explant rate occurring at a mean time of 74 days. Of those breasts that developed skin compromise, 45% went on to require eventual explant. Patients in the study were followed for an average of 6.3 months. Conclusions Immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction using tissue expanders without ADM offers a viable alternative to established reconstructive paradigms. The major complication rate for prepectoral reconstruction without the use of ADM (17%) was found to be comparable with our historical subpectoral tissue expander reconstruction with ADM use. Tissue expander explant rates were also comparable between the prepectoral without ADM (13%) and the subpectoral with ADM cohorts. These preliminary data suggest that immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander placement without accompanying ADM is viable alternative in the breast reconstructive algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:S205 / S208
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy - A Swedish matched cohort study [J].
Adam, H. ;
Bygdeson, M. ;
de Boniface, J. .
EJSO, 2014, 40 (10) :1209-1215
[2]  
American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2020, Plast Surg
[3]   BREAST RECONSTRUCTION UTILIZING SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE EXPANSION FOLLOWED BY POLYURETHANE-COVERED SILICONE IMPLANTS - A 6-YEAR EXPERIENCE [J].
ARTZ, JS ;
DINNER, MI ;
FOGLIETTI, MA ;
SAMPLINER, J .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1991, 88 (04) :635-639
[4]   Cost Analysis of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix [J].
de Blacam, Catherine ;
Momoh, Adeyiza O. ;
Colakoglu, Salih ;
Slavin, Sumner A. ;
Tobias, Adam M. ;
Lee, Bernard T. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 69 (05) :516-520
[5]   Review of Outcomes in Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction with and without Surgical Mesh Assistance [J].
DeLong, Michael R. ;
Tandon, Vickram J. ;
Bertrand, Anthony A. ;
MacEachern, Mark ;
Goldberg, Mytien ;
Salibian, Arthur ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Festekjian, Jaco H. ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (02) :305-315
[6]   Prepectoral Dual-Port Tissue Expander Placement Can This Eliminate Suction Drain Use? [J].
Franck, Philipp ;
Chadab, Tara ;
Poveromo, Luke ;
Ellison, Angela ;
Simmons, Rache ;
Otterburn, David Mark .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 :S60-S62
[7]   BREAST RECONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING MASTECTOMY - A COMPARISON OF SUB-MUSCULAR AND SUBCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES [J].
GRUBER, RP ;
KAHN, RA ;
LASH, H ;
MASER, MR ;
APFELBERG, DB ;
LAUB, DR .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1981, 67 (03) :312-317
[8]   The Suture Tab Technique: Securing Implant Position in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction [J].
Janhofer, David E. ;
Economides, James M. ;
Song, David H. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (12)
[9]   Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in 99 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years [J].
Jensen, J. Arthur ;
Orringer, Jay S. ;
Giuliano, Armando E. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (06) :1665-1670
[10]   COMPLICATIONS OF SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY AND REPLACEMENT BY CRONIN SILASTIC MAMMARY PROSTHESIS [J].
KELLY, AP ;
JACOBSON, HS ;
FOX, JI ;
JENNY, H .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1966, 37 (05) :438-&