Fractal Analysis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

被引:17
|
作者
Fabrizii, Markus [1 ]
Moinfar, Farid [2 ,3 ]
Jelinek, Herbert F. [4 ,5 ]
Karperien, Audrey [4 ]
Ahammer, Helmut [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Ctr Physiol Med, Inst Biophys, Graz, Austria
[2] Med Univ Graz, Inst Pathol, Unit Breast & Gynaecol Pathol, Graz, Austria
[3] Hosp Sisters Char, Dept Pathol, Linz, Austria
[4] Charles Sturt Univ, Ctr Res Complex Syst, Albury, NSW, Australia
[5] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Community Hlth, Albury, NSW, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
EUROPEAN GUIDELINES; CLINICAL MANAGEMENT; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; DIMENSIONS; CYTOLOGY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0108457
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) represent precursor lesions of cervical cancer. These neoplastic lesions are traditionally subdivided into three categories CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3, using microscopical criteria. The relation between grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and its fractal dimension was investigated to establish a basis for an objective diagnosis using the method proposed. Methods: Classical evaluation of the tissue samples was performed by an experienced gynecologic pathologist. Tissue samples were scanned and saved as digital images using Aperio scanner and software. After image segmentation the box counting method as well as multifractal methods were applied to determine the relation between fractal dimension and grades of CIN. A total of 46 images were used to compare the pathologist's neoplasia grades with the predicted groups obtained by fractal methods. Results: Significant or highly significant differences between all grades of CIN could be found. The confusion matrix, comparing between pathologist's grading and predicted group by fractal methods showed a match of 87.1%. Multifractal spectra were able to differentiate between normal epithelium and low grade as well as high grade neoplasia. Conclusion: Fractal dimension can be considered to be an objective parameter to grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
    He, Yue
    Zhao, Qun
    Geng, Yu-Ning
    Yang, Shu-Li
    Yin, Cheng-Hong
    Wu, Yu-Mei
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (17)
  • [2] Analysis of related factors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia complicated with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
    Y.Y. Zhang
    R. Xia
    D. Chen
    X. Zhang
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2022, 24 : 902 - 908
  • [3] Analysis of related factors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia complicated with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
    Zhang, Y. Y.
    Xia, R.
    Chen, D.
    Zhang, X.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 (05): : 902 - 908
  • [4] Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Denny, L. A.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 1 (01) : 5 - 8
  • [5] CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    SHARP, F
    DUNCAN, ID
    HARE, MJ
    ANDERSON, MC
    CORDINER, JW
    JORDAN, JA
    MONAGHAN, JM
    MURPHY, JF
    SHEPHERD, JH
    SINGER, A
    LANCET, 1983, 2 (8348): : 515 - 515
  • [6] CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    JENKINS, D
    JONES, MH
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 297 (6647): : 555 - 555
  • [7] CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    ROBINSON, AJ
    TULLETT, J
    WILSON, JD
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 297 (6644): : 359 - 360
  • [8] CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    ALDERSON, M
    CORREA, P
    FORD, J
    JENSEN, OM
    KUPKA, K
    MILLER, AB
    MUIR, CS
    NECTOU, J
    WATERHOUSE, JA
    YOUNG, JL
    LANCET, 1983, 1 (8334): : 1166 - 1166
  • [9] CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    BUCKLEY, CH
    BUTLER, EB
    FOX, H
    LANCET, 1983, 1 (8338): : 1389 - 1390
  • [10] Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Crum, CP
    McLachlin, CM
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 1995, : 71 - 79