A prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector versus other options for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia: breast cancer subgroup analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Mahtani, Reshma L. [1 ]
Belani, Rajesh [2 ]
Crawford, Jeffrey [3 ]
Dale, David [4 ]
DeCosta, Lucy [5 ]
Gawade, Prasad L. [2 ]
Huynh, Chanh [6 ]
Lawrence, Tatiana [2 ]
Lewis, Sandra [2 ]
MacLaughlin, William W. [7 ]
Narang, Mohit [8 ]
Rifkin, Robert [9 ]
机构
[1] Baptist Hlth South Florida, Miami Canc Inst, Miami, FL 33139 USA
[2] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Amgen Ltd, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[6] Canc Care Associates York, York, PA USA
[7] Riverside Hlth Syst, Chesapeake, VA USA
[8] US Oncol Res, Columbia, MD USA
[9] US Oncol Res, Rocky Mt Canc Ctr, Denver, CO USA
关键词
Pegfilgrastim; Febrile neutropenia; Breast cancer; Compliance; Chemotherapy; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; DOSE INTENSITY; CHEMOTHERAPY; HOSPITALIZATIONS; MODELS; COSTS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-022-07025-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer chemotherapy often carries a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN); guidelines recommend prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), such as pegfilgrastim. Neulasta (R) Onpro (R) on-body injector (OBI) is a delivery device administering pegfilgrastim approximately 27 h after application. Methods This prospective study examined patients with breast cancer who received chemotherapy with a high risk of FN, receiving OBI ("OBI") or other options (other G-CSF or none; "other"). The primary endpoint was FN incidence; secondary endpoints included chemotherapy delivery, adherence (G-CSF in all cycles), compliance (G-CSF day after chemotherapy), and FN incidence in patients receiving curative or palliative treatment. Results A total of 1776 patients with breast cancer were enrolled (OBI, n = 1196; other, n = 580). Across all cycles, FN incidence was lower for OBI (4.4% [95% CI, 3.3-5.6%]) than other (7.4% [5.3-9.6%]). For curative treatment, the FN incidence across all cycles was lower for OBI (4.6% [3.4-5.8%]) than for other (7.1% [5.0-9.3%]). For palliative treatment (OBI, n = 33; other, n = 20), 3 patients (15%) in the other and none in the OBI group had FN. After adjusting for baseline covariates, FN incidence remained lower for OBI (4.6% [3.5-6.1%]) versus other (7.8% [5.7-10.5%]). Adherence was higher for OBI (93.8%) than for other G-CSF (69.8%), as was compliance (90.5 and 53.2%, respectively). Chemotherapy dose delays/ reductions were similar for OBI (4.7%/32.3%, respectively) and other (4.7%/30.0%) groups. Conclusion Pegfilgrastim OBI was associated with a lower FN incidence in patients with breast cancer compared to other options for FN prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:6135 / 6144
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector versus other options for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia: breast cancer subgroup analysis
    Reshma L. Mahtani
    Rajesh Belani
    Jeffrey Crawford
    David Dale
    Lucy DeCosta
    Prasad L. Gawade
    Chanh Huynh
    Tatiana Lawrence
    Sandra Lewis
    William W. MacLaughlin
    Mohit Narang
    Robert Rifkin
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 6135 - 6144
  • [2] A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices
    Rifkin, Robert M.
    Crawford, Jeffrey
    Mahtani, Reshma L.
    Dale, David C.
    Narang, Mohit
    MacLaughlin, William W.
    Huynh, Chanh
    Gawade, Prasad L.
    Lewis, Sandra
    DeCosta, Lucy
    Lawrence, Tatiana
    Belani, Rajesh
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (10) : 7913 - 7922
  • [3] A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices
    Robert M. Rifkin
    Jeffrey Crawford
    Reshma L. Mahtani
    David C. Dale
    Mohit Narang
    William W. MacLaughlin
    Chanh Huynh
    Prasad L. Gawade
    Sandra Lewis
    Lucy DeCosta
    Tatiana Lawrence
    Rajesh Belani
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 7913 - 7922
  • [4] Febrile neutropenia in adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis
    Ngamphaiboon, Nuttapong
    O'Connor, Tracey L.
    Advani, Pooja P.
    Levine, Ellis G.
    Kossoff, Ellen B.
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 29 (03) : 1495 - 1501
  • [5] An observational, prospective, open label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim as secondary prophylaxis to decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia in Korean female patients with breast cancer
    Lee, Anbok
    Kang, Taewoo
    Kang, Su Hwan
    Park, Woo-Chan
    Lim, Woosung
    Chang, Myung-Chul
    Kim, Hyun Yul
    Song, Jeong-yoon
    Lee, Jihyoun
    Byun, Kyung Do
    Kim, Hyun-Ah
    Son, Gil Soo
    Kim, Ju-Yeon
    Oh, Se Jeong
    Chung, Min Sung
    Choi, Young Jin
    Shin, Hyuk-Jai
    Baek, Jong Min
    Yoo, Youngbum
    Um, Eunhae
    Choi, Jin Hyuk
    Kwak, Beom Seok
    Park, Min Ho
    Lee, Suok Hyun
    Kim, Cheol Seung
    Lee, Ilkyun
    Kim, Je-Ryong
    Lee, Han Shin
    Lim, Cheol Wan
    BREAST, 2023, 72
  • [6] Cost Effectiveness of Primary Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis in Patients With Breast Cancer at Risk of Febrile Neutropenia
    Aarts, Maureen J.
    Grutters, Janneke P.
    Peters, Frank P.
    Mandigers, Caroline M.
    Dercksen, M. Wouter
    Stouthard, Jacqueline M.
    Nortier, Hans J.
    van Laarhoven, Hanneke W.
    van Warmerdam, Laurence J.
    van de Wouw, Agnes J.
    Jacobs, Esther M.
    Mattijssen, Vera
    van der Rijt, Carin C.
    Smilde, Tineke J.
    van der Velden, Annette W.
    Temizkan, Mehmet
    Batman, Erdogan
    Muller, Erik W.
    van Gastel, Saskia M.
    Joore, Manuela A.
    Borm, George F.
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (34) : 4283 - 4289
  • [7] Cost of Pegfilgrastim for the Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Perioperative Chemotherapy in Daily Practice in Japan: A Posthoc Analysis in a Single-center Retrospective Study
    Tomomatsu, Takuya
    Shimizu, Hisanori
    Yokokawa, Takashi
    Fukada, Ippei
    Kawakami, Kazuyoshi
    Kobayashi, Kazuo
    Aoyama, Takeshi
    Suzuki, Wataru
    Sugisaki, Takahito
    Hashimoto, Koki
    Asano, Maimi
    Mori, Yuka
    Hara, Fumikata
    Takano, Toshimi
    Ohno, Shinji
    Yamaguchi, Masakazu
    YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2024, 144 (09): : 897 - 904
  • [8] Multicentre, Prospective Observational Study of Pegfilgrastim Primary Prophylaxis in Patients at High Risk of Febrile Neutropenia in Poland: PROFIL Study
    Jurczak, Wojciech
    Kalinka-Warzocha, Ewa
    Chmielowska, Ewa
    Duchnowska, Renata
    Wojciechowska-Lampka, Elzbieta
    Wieruszewska, Karolina
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2015, 19 (03): : 214 - 219
  • [9] Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia
    McBride, Ali
    Campbell, Kim
    Bikkina, Mohan
    MacDonald, Karen
    Abraham, Ivo
    Balu, Sanjeev
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (10) : 1083 - 1093
  • [10] Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany
    Sehouli, J.
    Goertz, A.
    Steinle, T.
    Dubois, R.
    Plesnila-Frank, C.
    Lalla, A.
    von Minckwitz, G.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 135 (09) : 385 - 389